A multi-phase lane change decision-making method for autonomous vehicles

被引:0
作者
Cai, Lei [1 ]
Guan, Hsin [1 ]
Xu, Qi Hong [1 ]
Jia, Xin [1 ]
Zhan, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, State Key Lab Automot Simulat & Control, Nanling Campus, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lane change; decision making; overtaking; game theory; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1177/09544070241265401
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Lane changing is one of the common behaviors in urban and highway scenarios. Therefore, lane-changing behavior is very important in autonomous driving decisions. First, lane change (LC) decisions are divided into waiting to LC, overtaking, LC, and returning to the original lane (RTOL). The LC can be divided into a lane change preparation phase (LCPP), a lane change execution phase (LCEP) 1, and a LCEP 2. The driving intention during the LCPP is further determined by determining the optimal longitudinal acceleration during the LCPP. Second, the conditions under which the host vehicle (HV) chooses to overtake, wait to LC, and choose to LC are proposed, that is, a method for determining the choice of different LC driving options. A condition is proposed for HV to give up overtaking. Third, the practice of determining the interaction process between the host and rear vehicles based on the potential conflict area (PCA) is proposed in LCEP 1. The interaction between the two cars is constructed using a dynamic game method. Finally, VTD (Virtual Test Drive) simulates and verifies the proposed LC decision system.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Bouton M, 2019, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P3441, DOI [10.1109/ITSC.2019.8916924, 10.1109/itsc.2019.8916924]
[2]   Multi-maneuver vertical parking path planning and control in a narrow space [J].
Cai, Lei ;
Guan, Hsin ;
Zhang, Hao Lun ;
Jia, Xin ;
Zhan, Jun .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2022, 149
[3]   DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Driving [J].
Chen, Chenyi ;
Seff, Ari ;
Kornhauser, Alain ;
Xiao, Jianxiong .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV), 2015, :2722-2730
[4]  
Dong CY, 2017, IEEE INT C INTELL TR
[5]   An Integrated Framework of Decision Making and Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Social Behaviors [J].
Hang, Peng ;
Lv, Chen ;
Huang, Chao ;
Cai, Jiacheng ;
Hu, Zhongxu ;
Xing, Yang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (12) :14458-14469
[6]   Robust Lane Change Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles: An Observation Adversarial Reinforcement Learning Approach [J].
He, Xiangkun ;
Yang, Haohan ;
Hu, Zhongxu ;
Lv, Chen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES, 2023, 8 (01) :184-193
[7]  
Huang ZY, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2010.03118
[8]   Automated Driving in Uncertain Environments: Planning With Interaction and Uncertain Maneuver Prediction [J].
Hubmann, Constantin ;
Schulz, Jens ;
Becker, Marvin ;
Althoff, Daniel ;
Stiller, Christoph .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES, 2018, 3 (01) :5-17
[9]   Autonomous Vehicle Cut-In Algorithm for Lane-Merging Scenarios via Policy-Based Reinforcement Learning Nested Within Finite-State Machine [J].
Hwang, Seulbin ;
Lee, Kibeom ;
Jeon, Hyeongseok ;
Kum, Dongsuk .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (10) :17594-17606
[10]   Estimating the Social Gap With a Game Theory Model of Lane Changing [J].
Ji, Ang ;
Levinson, David .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (10) :6320-6329