Recommendations for developing a comprehensive point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) program in the emergency department: an Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group advocacy statement

被引:1
作者
Phillips, Luke [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Maclean, Alastair [5 ,6 ]
Monester, Josh [2 ,5 ]
Douglas, Joanne [5 ,7 ]
Davidson, Stacey [5 ]
King, Gabriela [5 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Emergency Dept, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Alfred Hlth, Emergency & Trauma Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Fac Med, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Emergency Med Ultrasound Grp Aus NZ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Tauranga Hosp, Te Whatu Ora Hauora toi, Emergency Dept, Tauranga, New Zealand
[7] Australasian Soc Ultrasound Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Auckland City Hosp, Emergency Dept, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand
[9] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
competency; education; emergency medicine; POCUS; point-of-care ultrasound; program management;
D O I
10.1111/1742-6723.14484
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectivesPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes the risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs. MethodsEmergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by clinical leaders in ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia. ResultsThe recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality. ConclusionThese recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 963
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] American College of Emergency Physicians, 2023, AM COLL EMERGENCY PH
  • [2] American College of Emergency Physicians, 2018, POLICY STATEMENT GUI
  • [3] ASUM, CERTIFICATE CLINICIA
  • [4] ASUM, DIPLOMA DIAGNOSTIC U
  • [5] Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2023, POL P733 RECC HLTH S
  • [6] Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2021, POL STAT S686 CLEAN
  • [7] Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2023, ACEM CURRICULUM 2022
  • [8] Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2015, ACEM CURRICULUM FRAM
  • [9] Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2023, PROVISION FOCUSED UL
  • [10] Cormack Carolynne J, 2019, Australas J Ultrasound Med, V22, P12, DOI 10.1002/ajum.12126