Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion

被引:0
作者
Park, Kye-Yeung [1 ]
Kang, Ye Ji [2 ]
Park, Hoon-Ki [1 ]
Hwang, Hwan-Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Family Med, 222 Wangsimni Ro, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Educ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Feedback; objective structured clinical examination; peer; preceptor; remediation; video; WORKPLACE-BASED ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL SKILLS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; FEEDBACK; REMEDIATION; PERCEPTIONS; EDUCATION; SCHOOL; OSCE;
D O I
10.1080/10872981.2024.2392428
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Video-recordings review of patient encounters is reported to improve the clinical performance of medical students. However, evidence on specific remediation strategies or outcomes are lacking. We aimed to implement videorecording-based remediation of standardized patient encounters among medical students, combined with preceptor one-on-one feedback or peer group discussion, and evaluate the effectiveness of the two remediation methods using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Methods: Following standardized patient encounters, 107 final-year medical students were divided into two groups based on different remediation methods of video review: (1) precepted video review with preceptor feedback (N = 55) and (2) private video review and subsequent peer group discussion under supervision (N = 52). All students underwent twelve-stations of OSCE both before and after the video review. Students' pre- and post-remediation OSCE scores, self-efficacy level in patient encounters, and level of educational satisfaction with each method were assessed and compared between different video-based remediation methods to evaluate their respective effects. Results: After remediation, the total and subcomponent OSCE scores, such as history taking, physical examination, and patient - physician interaction (PPI), among all students increased significantly. Post-remediation OSCE scores showed no significant difference between two remediation methods (preceptor module, 79.6 +/- 4.3 vs. peer module, 79.4 +/- 3.8 in the total OSCE score). Students' self-efficacy levels increased after remediation in both modules (both p-value <0.001), with no difference between the two modules. However, students' satisfaction level was higher in the preceptor module than in the peer module (80.1 +/- 17.7 vs. 59.2 +/- 25.1, p-value <0.001). Among students with poor baseline OSCE performance, a prominent increase in PPI scores was observed in the preceptor-based module. Conclusion: Video-based remediation of patient encounters, either through preceptor review with one-on-one feedback or through private review with peer discussion, was equally effective in improving the OSCE scores and self-efficacy levels of medical students. Underperforming students can benefit from precepted video reviews for building PPI.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Remediation of learners struggling with communication skills: a systematic review [J].
Al-Sheikhly, Deema ;
Ostlundh, Linda ;
Arayssi, Thurayya .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
[2]   Perceptions On Reciprocal Peer Teaching Among Medical Students As Learners And As Tutors [J].
AlShareef, Saad Mohammed ;
Aldayel, Abdulrahman Yousef ;
Alghamdi, Hamid Mohammed ;
Alosaimi, Mohammed Buraik ;
Alharbi, Muteb Mousa ;
Aldayel, Abdulaziz Abdulrahman ;
Alhussain, Hamad Abdulaziz .
ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2019, 10 :817-827
[3]   Medical Students' Perception and Perceived Value of Peer Learning in Undergraduate Clinical Skill Development and Assessment: Mixed Methods Study [J].
Alzaabi, Shaikha ;
Nasaif, Mohammed ;
Khamis, Amar Hassan ;
Otaki, Farah ;
Zary, Nabil ;
Mascarenhas, Sharon .
JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 7 (03)
[4]  
Asan Onur, 2014, Inform Prim Care, V21, P161, DOI 10.14236/jhi.v21i4.72
[5]   Clinical skills in junior medical officers: a comparison of self-reported confidence and observed competence [J].
Barnsley, L ;
Lyon, PM ;
Ralston, SJ ;
Hibbert, EJ ;
Cunningham, I ;
Gordon, FC ;
Field, MJ .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (04) :358-367
[6]  
Behere Rohit, 2014, Educ Health (Abingdon), V27, P262, DOI 10.4103/1357-6283.152187
[7]   Why Medical Educators May Be Failing at Feedback [J].
Bing-You, Robert G. ;
Trowbridge, Robert L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (12) :1330-1331
[8]   Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect [J].
Bosse, Hans M. ;
Nickel, Martin ;
Huwendiek, Soeren ;
Juenger, Jana ;
Schultz, Jobst H. ;
Nikendei, Christoph .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 10
[9]   A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores [J].
Brannick, Michael T. ;
Erol-Korkmaz, H. Tugba ;
Prewett, Matthew .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (12) :1181-1189
[10]   Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages [J].
Carini, Robert M. ;
Kuh, George D. ;
Klein, Stephen P. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 47 (01) :1-32