Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Milanzi, Elasma [1 ]
Pelly, Rachel M. [1 ]
Hayes, Ian P. [2 ,3 ]
Gibbs, Peter [4 ]
Faragher, Ian [5 ]
Reece, Jeanette C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Neuroepidemiol Unit, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Colorectal Surg Unit, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Walter & Eliza Hall Inst Med Res, Personalised Oncol Div, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Western Hlth, Colorectal Surg Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
accuracy; MRI; N-stage; rectal cancer; T-stage; COLORECTAL-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; AGREEMENT; MRI; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27852
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectivesHigh-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.ResultsOverall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (kappa = 0.33) versus N-staging (kappa = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).ConclusionMRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1682
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil for local staging of rectal cancer
    Tamakawa, Mitsuharu
    Kawaai, Yuriko
    Shirase, Ryuji
    Satoh, Taishi
    Akiba, Hidenari
    Hyodoh, Hideki
    Hareyama, Masato
    Furuhata, Tomohisa
    Hirata, Koichi
    Hasegawa, Tadashi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04): : 290 - 298
  • [42] Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Imaging Beyond Morphology
    Prezzi, D.
    Goh, V.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (02) : 83 - 92
  • [43] The Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Endorectal Ultrasound for the Accurate Preoperative T-staging of Rectal Cancer
    Opara, Collins O.
    Khan, Farhana Yaqoob
    Kabiraj, Dr Gargi
    Kauser, Humaira
    Palakeel, Jaimee J.
    Ali, Mazin
    Chaduvula, Phani
    Chhabra, Sanika
    Lamichhane, Smriti Lamsal
    Ramesh, Vaiishnavi
    Mohammed, Lubna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [44] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer
    Furey, Elizabeth
    Jhaveri, Kartik S.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 22 (02) : 165 - +
  • [45] A Novel Magnetic Resonance Rectography for Rectal Cancer Staging
    Tang, Xue
    Zhang, Shi-Pai
    Luo, Yan
    Xia, Li-Gang
    Gong, Jing-Shan
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 131 (20) : 2506 - 2507
  • [46] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    G Brown
    S Davies
    G T Williams
    M W Bourne
    R G Newcombe
    A G Radcliffe
    J Blethyn
    N S Dallimore
    B I Rees
    C J Phillips
    T S Maughan
    British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 23 - 29
  • [47] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Rectal Cancer
    Dewhurst, Catherine E.
    Mortele, Koenraad J.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 51 (01) : 121 - +
  • [48] LOCAL STAGING OF RECTAL CANCER USING THE BLACK LUMEN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TECHNIQUE
    Piippo, U.
    Paakko, E.
    Makinen, M.
    Makela, J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 97 (03) : 237 - 242
  • [49] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    Brown, G
    Davies, S
    Williams, GT
    Bourne, MW
    Newcombe, RG
    Radcliffe, AG
    Blethyn, J
    Dallimore, NS
    Rees, BI
    Phillips, CJ
    Maughan, TS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [50] Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Rectal Cancer Staging: A Modern Multimodality Approach
    Reginelli, Alfonso
    Clemente, Alfredo
    Sangiovanni, Angelo
    Nardone, Valerio
    Selvaggi, Francesco
    Sciaudone, Guido
    Ciardiello, Fortunato
    Martinelli, Erika
    Grassi, Roberto
    Cappabianca, Salvatore
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (04) : 1 - 11