Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Milanzi, Elasma [1 ]
Pelly, Rachel M. [1 ]
Hayes, Ian P. [2 ,3 ]
Gibbs, Peter [4 ]
Faragher, Ian [5 ]
Reece, Jeanette C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Neuroepidemiol Unit, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Colorectal Surg Unit, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Walter & Eliza Hall Inst Med Res, Personalised Oncol Div, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Western Hlth, Colorectal Surg Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
accuracy; MRI; N-stage; rectal cancer; T-stage; COLORECTAL-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; AGREEMENT; MRI; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27852
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectivesHigh-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.ResultsOverall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (kappa = 0.33) versus N-staging (kappa = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).ConclusionMRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1682
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging of Rectal Adenocarcinoma
    Sprouse, Tina
    Jensen, Corey T.
    Vicens, Rafael
    Ernst, Randy
    Bhosale, Priya
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (06) : 885 - 889
  • [32] Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic impact of restaging by magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Soon Jin
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 113 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [33] The Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Approach for Identification of High-Risk Patients With Upper Rectal Cancer
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Lee, Youngin
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Min, Byung So
    Huh, Hyuk
    Koom, Woong Sub
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (02) : 293 - 298
  • [34] EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study
    Fernandez-Esparrach, Gloria
    Ayuso-Colella, Juan R.
    Sendino, Oriol
    Pages, Mario
    Cuatrecasas, Miriam
    Pellise, Maria
    Maurel, Joan
    Ayuso-Colella, Carmen
    Gonzalez-Suarez, Begona
    Llach, Josep
    Castells, Antoni
    Gines, Angels
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (02) : 347 - 354
  • [35] Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer-Can it be trusted?
    Ihnat, Peter
    Zidlik, Vladimir
    Rudinska, Lucia Ihnat
    Koscielnik, Pavel
    Hanzlikov, Pavla
    Skarda, Jozef
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 165
  • [36] The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in staging of vulvar cancer: A retrospective multi-centre study
    Kataoka, Masako Yano
    Sala, Evis
    Baldwin, Peter
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Farhadi, Alex
    Hudolin, Turtko
    Hricak, Hedvig
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [37] Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Clinical Staging in Cervical Cancer
    Shirazi, Ahmad Soltani
    Razi, Taghi
    Cheraghi, Fatemeh
    Rahim, Fakher
    Ehsani, Sara
    Davoodi, Mohammad
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (14) : 5729 - 5732
  • [38] Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Cancer-Analysis of Patients from the Prospective Study on Total Mesometrial Resection
    Stukan, Maciej
    Buderath, Paul
    Szulczynski, Bartosz
    Gebicki, Jacek
    Kimmig, Rainer
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (10)
  • [39] The role of cross-sectional imaging in staging of rectal cancer
    Schaefer, A. O.
    Langer, M.
    Baumann, T.
    CHIRURG, 2012, 83 (05): : 439 - +
  • [40] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Axillary Staging in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Mortellaro, Vincent E.
    Marshall, Julia
    Singer, Lauren
    Hochwald, Steven N.
    Chang, Myron
    Copeland, Edward M.
    Grobmyer, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (02) : 309 - 312