Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Milanzi, Elasma [1 ]
Pelly, Rachel M. [1 ]
Hayes, Ian P. [2 ,3 ]
Gibbs, Peter [4 ]
Faragher, Ian [5 ]
Reece, Jeanette C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Neuroepidemiol Unit, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Colorectal Surg Unit, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Walter & Eliza Hall Inst Med Res, Personalised Oncol Div, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Western Hlth, Colorectal Surg Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
accuracy; MRI; N-stage; rectal cancer; T-stage; COLORECTAL-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; AGREEMENT; MRI; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27852
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectivesHigh-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.ResultsOverall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (kappa = 0.33) versus N-staging (kappa = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).ConclusionMRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1682
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Gatti, Marco
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Stola, Silvia
    Benedini, Maria C.
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Morino, Mario
    Fonio, Paolo
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2018, 73 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit
    Videhult, P.
    Smedh, K.
    Lundin, P.
    Kraaz, W.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (05) : 412 - 419
  • [23] Factors affecting the restaging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer
    Kim, I. Y.
    Cha, S. W.
    Ahn, J. H.
    Kim, Y. W.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (04): : 493 - 498
  • [24] Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer
    Zhu, Junming
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Xue, Yuting
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zheng, Qingshui
    Xue, Xueyi
    Huang, Zhiyang
    Chen, Shaohao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (04) : 1024 - 1030
  • [25] Visualization of the pelvic nerves using magnetic resonance imaging for rectal cancer surgery
    Toshihiro Nakao
    Mitsuo Shimada
    Kozo Yoshikawa
    Takuya Tokunaga
    Masaaki Nishi
    Hideya Kashihara
    Chie Takasu
    Yuma Wada
    Toshiaki Yoshimoto
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 4315 - 4320
  • [26] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhuang, Zixuan
    Zhang, Yang
    Wei, Mingtian
    Yang, Xuyang
    Wang, Ziqiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [27] Visualization of the pelvic nerves using magnetic resonance imaging for rectal cancer surgery
    Nakao, Toshihiro
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Yoshikawa, Kozo
    Tokunaga, Takuya
    Nishi, Masaaki
    Kashihara, Hideya
    Takasu, Chie
    Wada, Yuma
    Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (06): : 4315 - 4320
  • [28] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting dentate line invasion in low rectal cancer
    Tatsumoto, Shota
    Itoh, Takahiro
    Takahama, Junko
    Marugami, Nagaaki
    Minamiguchi, Kiyoyuki
    Tanaka, Toshihiro
    Koyama, Fumikazu
    Morita, Kohei
    Kichikawa, Kimihiko
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 539 - 546
  • [29] Intra- and Interobserver Variability in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements in Rectal Cancer Patients
    Grimm, Peter
    Loft, Martina Kastrup
    Dam, Claus
    Pedersen, Malene Roland Vils
    Timm, Signe
    Rafaelsen, Soren Rafael
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [30] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor
    Peschaud, F
    Cuenod, CA
    Benoist, S
    Julié, C
    Beauchet, A
    Siauve, N
    Taieb-Kashi, F
    Penna, C
    Nordlinger, B
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (08) : 1603 - 1609