Multi-spacecraft study with the Icarus model

被引:0
作者
Baratashvili, T. [1 ]
Grison, B. [2 ]
Schmieder, B. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Demoulin, P. [3 ]
Poedts, S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Math Plasma Astrophys, Dept Math, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[2] CAS, Dept Space Phys, Inst Atmospher Phys, Prague 14100, Czech Republic
[3] Univ PSL, Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Univ, Sorbonne Paris Cite,LESIA,Observ Paris,CNRS, 5 Pl Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon, France
[4] Univ Glasgow, Sch Phys & Astron, SUPA, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
[5] Univ Maria Curie Sklodowska, Inst Phys, PL-20031 Lublin, Poland
关键词
magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); methods: numerical; methods: observational; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); Sun: heliosphere; solar wind; CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS; SOLAR-WIND SPEED; FLUX ROPES; EUHFORIA;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202450430
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are the main drivers of the disturbances in interplanetary space. Earth-directed CMEs can be dangerous, and understanding the CME interior magnetic structure is crucial for advancing space weather studies. It is important to assess the capabilities of a numerical heliospheric model, as a firm understanding of the nature and extent of its limitations can be used to improve the model and the space weather predictions based on it. Aims. The aim of the present study is to test the capabilities of the recently developed heliospheric model Icarus and the linear force-free spheromak model that has been implemented in it. Methods. To validate the Icarus space weather modelling tool, two CME events were selected that were observed by two spacecraft located near Mercury and Earth, respectively. This enables us to test the heliospheric model computed with Icarus at two distant locations. The source regions for the CMEs were identified, and the CME parameters were determined and later optimised. Different adaptive mesh refinement levels were applied in the simulations to assess its performance by comparing the simulation results to in situ measurements. Results. The first CME event erupted at 15:25 on July 9, 2013. The modelled time series were in good agreement with the observations both at MESSENGER and ACE. The second CME event started at 10:25 on February 16, 2014, and was more complicated, as three CME interactions occurred in this event. It was impossible to recover the observed profiles without modelling the other two CMEs that were observed, one before the main CME and one afterward. The parameters for the three CMEs were identified and the three CMEs were modelled in Icarus. For both CME studies, AMR level 3 was sufficient to reconstruct small-scale features near Mercury, while at Earth, AMR level 4 was necessary due to the radially stretched grid that was used. Conclusions. The profiles obtained at both spacecraft resemble the in situ measurements well. The current limitations of the space weather modelling tool result in an excessively small deceleration of the CME propagation during the CME-CME interaction as measured by MESSENGER and ACE.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Arge CN, 2003, AIP CONF PROC, V679, P190, DOI 10.1063/1.1618574
[2]   The Spheromak Tilting and How it Affects Modeling Coronal Mass Ejections [J].
Asvestari, Eleanna ;
Rindlisbacher, Tobias ;
Pomoell, Jens ;
Kilpua, Emilia K. J. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 926 (01)
[3]   The effect of adaptive mesh refinement and grid stretching on the magnetized coronal mass ejection model in Icarus [J].
Baratashvili, T. ;
Poedts, S. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2024, 683
[4]   Improving CME evolution and arrival predictions with AMR and grid stretching in Icarus [J].
Baratashvili, T. ;
Verbeke, C. ;
Wijsen, N. ;
Poedts, S. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2022, 667
[5]  
Baratashvili T., 2022, Sun and Geosphere, V17
[6]   The large angle spectroscopic coronagraph (LASCO) [J].
Brueckner, GE ;
Howard, RA ;
Koomen, MJ ;
Korendyke, CM ;
Michels, DJ ;
Moses, JD ;
Socker, DG ;
Dere, KP ;
Lamy, PL ;
Llebaria, A ;
Bout, MV ;
Schwenn, R ;
Simnett, GM ;
Bedford, DK ;
Eyles, CJ .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1995, 162 (1-2) :357-402
[7]   A MAGNETIC CLOUD AND A CORONAL MASS EJECTION [J].
BURLAGA, LF ;
KLEIN, L ;
SHEELEY, NR ;
MICHELS, DJ ;
HOWARD, RA ;
KOOMEN, MJ ;
SCHWENN, R ;
ROSENBAUER, H .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1982, 9 (12) :1317-1320
[8]  
BURLAGA LF, 1991, PHYSICS CHEM SPACE, V21, P1
[9]   Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996-2002 [J].
Cane, HV ;
Richardson, IG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A4)
[10]   ON FORCE-FREE MAGNETIC FIELDS [J].
CHANDRASEKHAR, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1956, 42 (01) :1-5