Relapse prevention of bipolar disorders: an explorative cluster analytical approach in a randomized controlled psychotherapy study

被引:0
作者
Hautzinger, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Fachbereich Psychol, Klin Psychol & Psychotherapie, Schleichstr 4, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
来源
NERVENARZT | 2024年
关键词
Bipolar; 1; disorder; 2; Cognitive behavior therapy; Supportive psychotherapy; Relapse prevention; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; MANIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00115-024-01720-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to differentiate between types of bipolar disorders and the associated features using explorative analysis. The focus was particularly on the role of bipolar 1 and bipolar 2 disorders as well as the influence of prophylactic interventions for relapse in a randomized, controlled treatment study. A total of 274 of the 305 originally included persons could be investigated in the study. Patients participated in either cognitive behavioral group therapy (SEKT) or supportive, patient-centered group therapy (FEST). Treatment took place over 4 days separated by a 1-month interval (equivalent to 16 double hours). Depressive and manic symptoms were assessed using the longitudinal interval follow-up evaluation (LIFE). The symptoms were retrospectively assessed for the previous 6 months, with respect to each week before and after the intervention phase and for 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. The results show that the effects of both group therapies were comparable; however, there were statistically significant differences in a multivariate proportional hazards model for the factors bipolar 1 and 2 as well as the interaction of therapy with bipolar 1 and 2. In particular, bipolar 2 patients benefited significantly less from the SEKT intervention than from the FEST intervention. There were three clusters identified that separated bipolar 1 (SEKT, no comorbidity, predominantly no recurrences, younger patients), from bipolar 2 (FEST, no comorbidity, at least 1 often 2 recurrences, older patients) and from a heterogeneous group (SEKT and FEST, comorbidity). The distinction between bipolar 1 and bipolar 2 disorder is important and has so far not received sufficient attention. Bipolar 2 disorders generally have a worse course and respond particularly poorly to cognitive behavioral therapy (SEKT). An open, unstructured, supportive, patient-centered psychotherapy (FEST) is generally effective.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Rating scales for mania: is self-rating reliable? [J].
Altman, E .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1998, 50 (2-3) :283-286
[2]  
Assion H-J., 2022, Bipolare Strungen
[3]   Psychosocial interventions for the prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder: systematic review of controlled trials [J].
Beynon, Suzanne ;
Soares-Weiser, Karla ;
Woolacott, Nerys ;
Duffy, Steven ;
Geddes, John R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 192 (01) :5-11
[4]   Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Chiang, Kai-Jo ;
Tsai, Jui-Chen ;
Liu, Doresses ;
Lin, Chueh-Ho ;
Chiu, Huei-Ling ;
Chou, Kuei-Ru .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)
[5]  
DGBS DGPPN, 2020, S3 Leitlinie: Diagnostik und TherapiebipolarerStorungen, V2
[6]  
Hautzinger M., 2024, Bipolare Strungen, V2
[7]   Adjuvant Psychotherapies to Prevent Relapse in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Hautzinger, Martin .
JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 81 (09) :855-862
[8]  
KELLER MB, 1987, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V44, P540
[9]  
Markowitz J. C., 2022, Brief Supportive Psychotherapy: A Treatment Manual and Clinical Approach, DOI [10.1093/med-psych/9780197635803.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780197635803.001.0001]
[10]   Cognitive behaviour therapy and supportive therapy for bipolar disorders: relapse rates for treatment period and 2-year follow-up [J].
Meyer, T. D. ;
Hautzinger, M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (07) :1429-1439