Intertemporal Empathy Decline: Feeling Less Distress for Future Others' Suffering

被引:3
作者
Coleman, Matthew [1 ]
DeSteno, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Psychol, 360 Huntington Ave,125 Nightingale Hall, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
empathy; future well-being; intergenerational cooperation; prosocial behavior; SELF-CONTINUITY; ALTRUISM; DELAY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1037/emo0001402
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present actions of individuals and society at large can cause outsized consequences on future generations' quality of life. Moral philosophers have explored how people should value the well-being of future generations. Yet, the question of how people actually feel when considering the plight of others in the future compared to the present remains understudied. In four experiments (N = 4,698), we demonstrate evidence of an intertemporal empathy decline such that people feel less empathy toward another person's suffering in the future compared to the present (Studies 1-4) despite predicting that the same amount of pain would be felt (Studies 1-2). Despite this, imagining another person's suffering in the future leads to placing greater value on future generations' welfare (Study 2). We also show that this intertemporal empathy decline reduces the amount people donate to a future-oriented versus present-oriented charity of the same type (Study 3). Finally, we find that prompting people to more vividly imagine another person's future suffering attenuates the decline in intertemporal empathy (Study 4). Together, this research identifies empathy as a present-biased psychological obstacle impeding future-oriented prosocial behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1975 / 1984
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other
    Albrecht, Konstanze
    Volz, Kirsten G.
    Sutter, Matthias
    Laibson, David I.
    von Cramon, D. Yves
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 6 (02) : 218 - 225
  • [2] Psychological Connectedness and Intertemporal Choice
    Bartels, Daniel M.
    Rips, Lance J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2010, 139 (01) : 49 - 69
  • [3] Influencing support of charitable objectives in the near and distant future: delay discounting and the moderating influence of construal level
    Bischoff, Claudia
    Hansen, Jochim
    [J]. SOCIAL INFLUENCE, 2016, 11 (04) : 217 - 229
  • [4] Empathy and Its Discontents
    Bloom, Paul
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [5] Present Bias
    Chakraborty, Anujit
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2021, 89 (04) : 1921 - 1961
  • [6] Coleman M., 2024, IMPORTANT IS END HUM
  • [7] Valuing future life and future lives: A framework for understanding discounting
    Frederick, Shane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) : 667 - 680
  • [8] Prospection: Experiencing the future
    Gilbert, Daniel T.
    Wilson, Timothy D.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 317 (5843) : 1351 - 1354
  • [9] PREDICTING RETIREMENT SAVINGS USING SURVEY MEASURES OF EXPONENTIAL-GROWTH BIAS AND PRESENT BIAS
    Goda, Gopi Shah
    Levy, Matthew
    Manchester, Colleen Flaherty
    Sojourner, Aaron
    Tasoff, Joshua
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2019, 57 (03) : 1636 - 1658
  • [10] Greaves Hillary, 2021, The case for strong longtermism