From Gender Gap to Gender Gaps: Bringing Nonbinary People into Political Behavior Research

被引:6
作者
Albaugh, Quinn M. [1 ]
Harell, Allison [2 ]
Loewen, Peter John [3 ,4 ]
Rubenson, Daniel [5 ]
Stephenson, Laura B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Kingston, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Cornell Univ, Coll Arts & Sci, Ithaca, NY USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Govt, Ithaca, NY USA
[5] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Polit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Western Ontario, Polit Sci, London, ON, Canada
关键词
US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS; VOTING-BEHAVIOR; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1017/S1537592724000975
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The "gender gap" in voting is one of the most well-documented findings in survey research across democracies. However, gender gap research has traditionally assumed that everyone is either a man or a woman, which does not account for the growing number of people who identify as nonbinary. How do nonbinary people differ from men and women in their party identification and voting behavior? We answer this question using data from the 2021 Canadian Election Study online panel, which has a large enough subsample of nonbinary respondents to identify gaps in party identification and voting behavior. Nonbinary people are much less likely to identify with and vote for the Liberal Party or Conservative Party and much more likely to identify with and vote for the social democratic New Democratic Party (NDP) than both men and women. Many of these gaps persist even when restricting the analysis to LGBTQ respondents, adjusting for demographic variables that predict nonbinary identity, and adjusting for issue attitudes. Nonbinary people's distinctiveness from men and women suggests that researchers need to add nonbinary response options to gender questions and, wherever possible, incorporate nonbinary people into analyses of gender and politics.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 304
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The Gender Gap in Voting Revisited: Women's Party Preferences in a European Context [J].
Abendschoen, Simone ;
Steinmetz, Stephanie .
SOCIAL POLITICS, 2014, 21 (02) :315-344
[2]   Toward a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART [J].
Achen, CH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 5 :423-450
[3]  
Albaugh Quinn Allison, 2024, HARVARD DATAVERSE, DOI [10.7910/DVN/LERDYS, DOI 10.7910/DVN/LERDYS]
[4]   Institutional opportunities and party position change: the case of LGBTQ plus rights in Canada [J].
Baisley, Elizabeth .
POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES, 2024, 12 (04) :826-852
[5]  
Bauer Greta., 2020, NONBINARY PEOPLE IDE
[6]   Explaining the Gender Gap: A Cross-National Analysis of Gender Differences in Voting [J].
Bergh, Johannes .
JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2007, 17 (03) :235-261
[7]   Sex isn't Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion [J].
Bittner, Amanda ;
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 39 (04) :1019-1041
[8]   Digging Deeper into the Gender Gap: Gender Salience as a Moderating Factor in Political Attitudes [J].
Bittner, Amanda ;
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2017, 50 (02) :559-578
[9]   Political identity, gender identity or both? The political effects of sexual orientation and gender identity items in survey research [J].
Cassino, Dan ;
Besen-Cassino, Yasemin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND GENDER, 2021, 4 (01) :71-91
[10]  
Cassino Dan, 2020, Survey Practice, V13, DOI [10.29115/SP-2020-0009, DOI 10.29115/SP-2020-0009]