EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR EARLY PREDICTION OF PRESSURE INJURY RISK

被引:4
作者
Alderden, Jenny [1 ]
Johnny, Jace [2 ,3 ]
Brooks, Katie R. [4 ]
Wilson, Andrew [3 ,5 ]
Yap, Tracey L. [4 ]
Zhao, Yunchuan [1 ]
van der Laan, Mark [6 ]
Kennerly, Susan [7 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Boise, ID USA
[2] Univ Utah, Intermt Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[5] Real World Data Analyt Parexel, Durham, NC USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Biostat & Stat, Berkeley, CA USA
[7] East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC USA
关键词
CRITICAL-CARE PATIENTS; BRADEN SCALE; ULCER; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.4037/ajcc2024856
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) have a major impact on patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs). Effective prevention relies on early and accurate risk assessment. Traditional risk-assessment tools, such as the Braden Scale, often fail to capture ICU-specific factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. Although artificial intelligence models offer improved accuracy, their "black box" nature poses a barrier to clinical adoption. Objective To develop an artificial intelligence-based HAPI risk-assessment model enhanced with an explainable artificial intelligence dashboard to improve interpretability at both the global and individual patient levels. Methods An explainable artificial intelligence approach was used to analyze ICU patient data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care. Predictor variables were restricted to the first 48 hours after ICU admission. Various machine-learning algorithms were evaluated, culminating in an ensemble "super learner" model. The model's performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve through 5-fold cross-validation. An explainer dashboard was developed (using synthetic data for patient privacy), featuring interactive visualizations for in-depth model interpretation at the global and local levels. Results The final sample comprised 28 395 patients with a 4.9% incidence of HAPIs. The ensemble super learner model performed well (area under curve = 0.80). The explainer dashboard provided global and patient-level interactive visualizations of model predictions, showing each variable's influence on the risk-assessment outcome. Conclusion The model and its dashboard provide clinicians with a transparent, interpretable artificial intelligence- based risk-assessment system for HAPIs that may enable more effective and timely preventive interventions. ( American Journal of Critical Care. 2024;33:373-381)
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 381
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Risk Factor Forecasting System for Pressure Injuries Through Artificial Neural Network [J].
Pedroso, B. M. ;
Guazzelli, J. V. S. ;
Silva, A. P. ;
Boschi, S. R. M. S. ;
Martini, S. C. ;
Scardovelli, T. A. .
IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2022, 20 (04) :634-642
[32]   A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity [J].
Lindgren, M ;
Unosson, M ;
Krantz, AM ;
Ek, AC .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 38 (02) :190-199
[33]   Application of infrared thermography in the early warning of pressure injury: A prospective observational study [J].
Cai, Fuman ;
Jiang, Xiaoqiong ;
Hou, Xiangqing ;
Wang, Duolao ;
Wang, Yu ;
Deng, Haisong ;
Guo, Hailei ;
Wang, Haishuang ;
Li, Xiaomei .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (3-4) :559-571
[34]   Biomarkers for the early detection of pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Wang, Ning ;
Lv, Lin ;
Yan, Fanghong ;
Ma, Yuxia ;
Miao, Lizhen ;
Chung, Loretta Yuet Foon ;
Han, Lin .
JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2022, 31 (02) :259-267
[35]   Convergent Validity of Three Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scales: Comparing the PPRA-Home (Pressure Injury Primary Risk Assessment Scale for Home Care) to Two Traditional Scales [J].
Kohta, Masushi ;
Ohura, Takehiko ;
Okada, Katsuyuki ;
Nakamura, Yoshinori ;
Kumagai, Eiko ;
Kataoka, Hitomi ;
Kitagawa, Tomomi ;
Kameda, Yuki ;
Kitte, Toshihiro .
JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2021, 14 :207-217
[36]   Comparison of pressure injury risk assessment outcomes using a structured assessment tool versus clinical judgement: A systematic review [J].
Lovegrove, Josephine ;
Ven, Saroeun ;
Miles, Sandra J. ;
Fulbrook, Paul .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (9-10) :1674-1690
[37]   A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and other best practice recommendations for pressure injury risk assessment in the United States [J].
Serafin, Anna ;
Graziadio, Sara ;
Velickovic, Vladica ;
Milde, Thurid-Christiane ;
Dinnes, Jacqueline ;
Sitch, Alice ;
Coombe, April ;
Mcnichol, Laurie ;
Armstrong, David G. ;
Lueck, Heather ;
Kottner, Jan .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2025, 33 (02)
[38]   Predictive ability of the EVARUCI scale and COMHON index for pressure injury risk in critically ill patients: A diagnostic accuracy study [J].
de los Angeles Leal-Felipe, M. ;
del Carmen Arroyo-Lopez, M. ;
del Cristo Robayna-Delgado, M. ;
Gomez-Espejo, Ana ;
Perera-Diaz, Patricia ;
Chinea-Rodriguez, Carmen D. ;
Garcia-Correa, Natalia ;
Jimenez-Sosa, Alejandro .
AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 31 (06) :355-361
[39]   Explainable Risk Prediction of Post-Stroke Adverse Mental Outcomes Using Machine Learning Techniques in a Population of 1780 Patients [J].
Oei, Chien Wei ;
Ng, Eddie Yin Kwee ;
Ng, Matthew Hok Shan ;
Tan, Ru-San ;
Chan, Yam Meng ;
Chan, Lai Gwen ;
Acharya, Udyavara Rajendra .
SENSORS, 2023, 23 (18)
[40]   Nutritional factors and pressure injury risk in hospitalised patients post-stroke [J].
Schott, Mairin ;
Dalmolin, Cristina ;
Golin, Anieli ;
Alves, Bruna Pessoa ;
Cassol, Milena Cervo ;
Brondani, Juliana Ebling ;
Marques, Andrea Rodrigues ;
Marques, Clandio Timm ;
Colpo, Elisangela .
JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2024, 33 :S32-S39