EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR EARLY PREDICTION OF PRESSURE INJURY RISK

被引:4
作者
Alderden, Jenny [1 ]
Johnny, Jace [2 ,3 ]
Brooks, Katie R. [4 ]
Wilson, Andrew [3 ,5 ]
Yap, Tracey L. [4 ]
Zhao, Yunchuan [1 ]
van der Laan, Mark [6 ]
Kennerly, Susan [7 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Boise, ID USA
[2] Univ Utah, Intermt Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[5] Real World Data Analyt Parexel, Durham, NC USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Biostat & Stat, Berkeley, CA USA
[7] East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC USA
关键词
CRITICAL-CARE PATIENTS; BRADEN SCALE; ULCER; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.4037/ajcc2024856
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) have a major impact on patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs). Effective prevention relies on early and accurate risk assessment. Traditional risk-assessment tools, such as the Braden Scale, often fail to capture ICU-specific factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. Although artificial intelligence models offer improved accuracy, their "black box" nature poses a barrier to clinical adoption. Objective To develop an artificial intelligence-based HAPI risk-assessment model enhanced with an explainable artificial intelligence dashboard to improve interpretability at both the global and individual patient levels. Methods An explainable artificial intelligence approach was used to analyze ICU patient data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care. Predictor variables were restricted to the first 48 hours after ICU admission. Various machine-learning algorithms were evaluated, culminating in an ensemble "super learner" model. The model's performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve through 5-fold cross-validation. An explainer dashboard was developed (using synthetic data for patient privacy), featuring interactive visualizations for in-depth model interpretation at the global and local levels. Results The final sample comprised 28 395 patients with a 4.9% incidence of HAPIs. The ensemble super learner model performed well (area under curve = 0.80). The explainer dashboard provided global and patient-level interactive visualizations of model predictions, showing each variable's influence on the risk-assessment outcome. Conclusion The model and its dashboard provide clinicians with a transparent, interpretable artificial intelligence- based risk-assessment system for HAPIs that may enable more effective and timely preventive interventions. ( American Journal of Critical Care. 2024;33:373-381)
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 381
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Automated Fall and Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Systems Nurses' Experiences, Perspectives, and Lessons Learned [J].
Jin, Yinji ;
Kim, Heejeong ;
Jin, Taixian ;
Lee, Sun-Mi .
CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2021, 39 (06) :321-328
[22]   Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study [J].
Chen, Yuan ;
Wang, Wei ;
Qian, Qianjian ;
Wu, Beiwen .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (10)
[23]   Comparison of individualized facial growth prediction models based on the partial least squares and artificial intelligence [J].
Moon, Jun-Ho ;
Shin, Hak-Kyun ;
Lee, Ju-Myung ;
Cho, Sung Joo ;
Park, Ji-Ae ;
Donatelli, Richard E. ;
Lee, Shin-Jae .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2024, 94 (02) :207-215
[24]   The Effect of Selected Risk Factors on Perioperative Pressure Injury Development [J].
Celik, Buket ;
Karayurt, Ozgul ;
Ogce, Filiz .
AORN JOURNAL, 2019, 110 (01) :29-38
[25]   Risk of pressure injury in the ICU: transcultural adaptation and reliability of EVARUCI [J].
Cremasco de Souza, Mariana Fernandes ;
Zanei, Suely Sueko Viski ;
Whitaker, Iveth Yamaguchi .
ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 31 (02) :201-208
[26]   A Cartoon Version of Braden Scale to Assess the Risk of Pressure Injury: Content Validity and Interrater Reliability Study [J].
Zhao, Jing ;
Sun, Hang ;
Cao, Yinan ;
Hu, Xinyu ;
Shan, Enfang ;
Li, Xianwen ;
Zhou, Yufeng .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 276 :394-403
[27]   Pressure Injury Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia Surgeries [J].
Chen, Wan-Yu ;
Hsu, Tsui-Hua ;
Chang, Chia-Hao ;
Lee, Chiu-Hsiang ;
Tzeng, Shu Chien .
WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2024, 70 (01)
[28]   Risk Factors for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients [J].
Cox, Jill .
CRITICAL CARE NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 32 (04) :473-+
[29]   Aetiology, risk factors and treatment of typical and atypical pressure ulcers in patients with traumatic brain injury: A narrative review [J].
Dehghani, Mohammadreza ;
Pourmontaseri, Hossein .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (03)
[30]   Heterogeneity hampers the identification of general pressure injury risk factors in intensive care populations: A predictive modelling analysis [J].
Deschepper, Mieke ;
Labeau, Sonia O. ;
Waegeman, Willem ;
Blot, Stijn I. .
INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2022, 68