Phallus preservation and reconstruction: 5-year outcomes of national penile cancer centralisation in the Republic of Ireland

被引:4
作者
Hogan, Donnacha [1 ]
Norton, Sarah M. [1 ]
Patterson, Kenneth [1 ]
Murphy, Adrian [2 ]
O'Neill, Brian [3 ]
Daly, Padraig [4 ]
Cullen, Ivor M. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Urol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Hosp Waterford, Dept Urol, Waterford, Ireland
[5] Natl Canc Control Programme, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dept Surg, Dublin, Ireland
来源
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND | 2024年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
Penile cancer; Organ preservation; Phallus preservation; Centralisation; Outcomes; MANAGEMENT; NETWORK; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Penile cancer is a rare urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2]. We aim to assess the outcomes after 5-years of national centralisation of penile cancer care. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients undergoing penile cancer surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 following centralisation of care were included. The primary outcome was proportion of phallus sparing procedures performed. Secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, histologic outcomes and procedures performed. Results: 124 patients underwent surgery in the study period. Mean age was 64.49 (+/- 13.87). Overall, 82.3% of patients underwent phallus sparing surgery. This remained stable over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 at 92%, 85%, 76%, 79% and 78% respectively (p = 0.534). 62.7% had reconstruction performed, including split-thickness skin graft neoglans formation, (57.8% [n = 37]), preputial flap (32.8% [n = 21]), glans resurfacing (4.7% [n = 3]), shaft advancement flap (1.6% [n = 1]), penile shaft skin graft (1.6% [n = 1]), and partial penectomy with urethral centralisation (1.6% [n = 1]). Phallus preservation was not affected by positive nodal status (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249-2.266], p = 0.564) or T-stage >= 1b (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153-1.711], p = 0.276). There has been a significant reduction in Nx nodal status from 64% in 2017 to 15% in 2021 (p = 0.009). Conclusion: Centralisation of treatment for rare malignancies such as penile cancer may improve oncologic outcomes and rates of phallus preservation. This study has shown centralisation to has a high rate of phallus preservation. Further long-term analysis of outcomes in Ireland is required.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 295
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Penile cancer in Ireland-A national review
    Anderson, S.
    Breen, K. J.
    Davis, N. F.
    Deady, S.
    Sweeney, P.
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (03): : 187 - 193
  • [2] Penile cancer - Guideline adherence produces optimum results
    Breen, K. J.
    O'Connor, K. M.
    Power, D. G.
    Mayer, N. J.
    Rogers, E.
    Sweeney, P.
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2015, 13 (04): : 200 - 206
  • [3] Stage Presentation, Care Patterns, and Treatment Outcomes for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis
    Burt, Lindsay M.
    Shrieve, Dennis C.
    Tward, Jonathan D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (01): : 94 - 100
  • [4] Phallus Preservation in Penile Cancer Surgery: Patient-reported Aesthetic & Functional Outcomes
    Croghan, Stefanie M.
    Compton, Niall
    Daniels, Anne E.
    Fitzgibbon, Linda
    Daly, Padraig J.
    Cullen, Ivor M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 152 : 60 - 66
  • [5] Is there a role for the development of a supra-regional network for the management of penile cancer in the Republic of Ireland?
    Davis, N. F.
    Fitzgerald, M.
    Burke, J. P.
    Breen, K. J.
    Elamin, S.
    Brady, C. M.
    Power, D. G.
    Hegarty, P. K.
    Sweeney, P.
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2016, 14 (02): : 82 - 86
  • [6] Efficacy of Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine against HPV Infection and Disease in Males
    Giuliano, Anna R.
    Palefsky, Joel M.
    Goldstone, Stephen
    Moreira, Edson D., Jr.
    Penny, Mary E.
    Aranda, Carlos
    Vardas, Eftyhia
    Moi, Harald
    Jessen, Heiko
    Hillman, Richard
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Ferris, Daron
    Rouleau, Danielle
    Bryan, Janine
    Marshall, J. Brooke
    Vuocolo, Scott
    Barr, Eliav
    Radley, David
    Haupt, Richard M.
    Guris, Dalya
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (05) : 401 - 411
  • [7] Group NCGS, 2002, Improving outcomes in urological cancers: the manual
  • [8] Centralization and Equitable Care in Rare Urogenital Malignancies: The Case for Penile Cancer
    Jakobsen, Jakob K.
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Ayres, Benjamin
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (05): : 924 - 928
  • [9] The development of a supraregional network for the management of penile cancer
    Kumar, P.
    Singh, S.
    Goddard, J. C.
    Terry, T. R.
    Summerton, D. J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2012, 94 (03) : 204 - 209
  • [10] A Canadian approach to the regionalization of testis cancer: A review
    Nason, Gregory J.
    Wood, Lori
    Huddart, Robert A.
    Albers, Peter
    Rendon, Ricardo A.
    Einhorn, Lawrence H.
    Nichols, Craig R.
    Kollmannsberger, Christian
    Anson-Cartwright, Lynn
    Sweet, Joan
    Warde, Padraig
    Jewett, Michael A. S.
    Chung, Peter
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    Hansen, Aaron R.
    Hamilton, Robert J.
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (10): : 346 - 351