Vulnerability-based seismic resilience and post-earthquake recovery assessment for substation systems

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Xiao [1 ]
Wu, Siyuan [1 ]
Xie, Qiang [1 ]
Li, Qiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] China Southern Power Grid Co Ltd, EHV Power Transmiss Co, Dali Bur, Dali 671000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Substation system; Functional network model; Seismic vulnerability; Seismic resilience; Post-earthquake recovery process; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107387
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The function of substation systems is significantly influenced by earthquakes. To assess the seismic resistance of substation systems and improve post-earthquake recovery efficiency, this study constructs a multi-module framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of substations. Based on the equipment functional status analysis module, a functional network model was established considering the structural function and electrical load of substation systems. The system functional state matrix was obtained through Monte Carlo simulation, and the seismic vulnerability was assessed from the aspects of electrical transmission reliability and the importance of power users. Subsequently, a substation functional index was established based on seismic vulnerability parameters. Post-earthquake functional recovery strategy analysis frameworks were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the recovery process. A stepped functional time-varying function was proposed through iterative analysis, thereby converting the probability parameters of functional status into seismic resilience deterministic indices. Through seismic resilience analysis of a typical 220 kV step-down substation, seismic vulnerability curves for both electrical transmission and power users were obtained. Furthermore, the seismic sensitive intervals of the substation and key equipment for post-earthquake recovery were clarified. Notably, the seismic resilience level and optimal recovery strategy of the typical 220 kV step-down substation were determined.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resilience-based post-earthquake recovery strategies for substation systems
    Liu, Xiao
    Xie, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 96
  • [2] A novel urban seismic resilience assessment method considering the weighting of post-earthquake loss and recovery time
    Zhai, Changhai
    Zhao, Yonggang
    Wen, WeiPing
    Qin, Hao
    Xie, LiLi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 84
  • [3] Post-earthquake recover strategy for substations based on seismic resilience evaluation
    Liu, Xiao
    Xie, Qiang
    Liang, Huangbin
    Zhang, Xiuli
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 279
  • [4] Voices of Vulnerability and Resilience: Children and Their Recollections in Post-Earthquake Tokyo
    Borland, Janet
    Japanese Studies, 2016, 36 (03) : 299 - 317
  • [5] Post-earthquake ignition vulnerability assessment of Kucukcekmece District
    Yildiz, S. S.
    Karaman, H.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (12) : 3357 - 3368
  • [6] Resilience-based post-earthquake recovery optimization of water distribution networks
    Song, Zhaoyang
    Liu, Wei
    Shu, Shihu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 74
  • [7] Earthquake and post-earthquake vulnerability assessment of urban gas pipelines network
    Saeideh Farahani
    Ahmad Tahershamsi
    Behrouz Behnam
    Natural Hazards, 2020, 101 : 327 - 347
  • [8] Earthquake and post-earthquake vulnerability assessment of urban gas pipelines network
    Farahani, Saeideh
    Tahershamsi, Ahmad
    Behnam, Behrouz
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 101 (02) : 327 - 347
  • [9] Seismic resilience assessment-informed UAV task allocation framework for post-earthquake survey
    Hou, Zhengyang
    You, Tian
    Wang, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2025, 116
  • [10] Probability-based seismic resilience assessment method for substation systems
    Li, Jichao
    Wang, Tao
    Shang, Qingxue
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (01) : 71 - 83