Modality in SFL Revisited: Establishing Evidentiality in the System of Modality

被引:0
作者
He, Zhongqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Foreign Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
WORD-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINGUISTIC ASSOCIATION | 2024年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
modality; evidentiality; systemic functional linguistics; categorization; realization; WRITTEN;
D O I
10.1080/00437956.2024.2380958
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In systemic functional linguistics (SFL), modality is seen as an extension of the semantic space of polarity. The SFL perspective provides a unique insight into the complexity of modality. However, it has received little attention in the open literature, and the SFL categorization of modality seems out of place compared to other perspectives. The purpose of this paper is to address the potential problems with the categorization of modality in SFL and to establish evidentiality in the system. To this end, the present study reviews the development of modality in SFL and justifies the need to replace usuality with evidentiality. The results show that there are four stages in the development of modality in SFL and that usuality, as a subtype of modality, faces challenges both from the later development of modality and from studies of grammatical metaphor in SFL. The paper then argues that the categorization of modality should be made along two dimensions, namely modality force and modality locus, and that evidentiality should take the place of usuality as a category in the system. The study also shows that evidentiality can be further divided into four types, and that it has eight ways of realization.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 198
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AIKHENVALD ALEXANDRAY., 2004, EVIDENTIALITY
  • [2] Alonso-Almeida F., 2011, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, V46, P59, DOI DOI 10.2478/V10121-010-0004-7
  • [3] Alramadan May M., 2022, Journal of Language and Language Teaching, V10, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i1.4548, DOI 10.33394/JOLLT.V10I1.4548]
  • [4] Berry M., 1975, INTRO SYSTEMIC LINGU
  • [5] ADVERBIAL STANCE TYPES IN ENGLISH
    BIBER, D
    FINEGAN, E
    [J]. DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1988, 11 (01) : 1 - 34
  • [6] Boye K, 2012, EMPIR APPROACH LANG, V43, P1, DOI 10.1515/9783110219036
  • [7] A minimalist treatment of modality
    Butler, J
    [J]. LINGUA, 2003, 113 (10) : 967 - 996
  • [8] Chafe W.L., 1986, EVIDENTIALITY LINGUI
  • [9] Coates J., 1983, SEMANTICS MODAL AUXI
  • [10] METADISCOURSE IN PERSUASIVE WRITING - A STUDY OF TEXTS WRITTEN BY AMERICAN AND FINNISH UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS
    CRISMORE, A
    MARKKANEN, R
    STEFFENSEN, MS
    [J]. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 1993, 10 (01) : 39 - 71