Essential livelihood recovery interventions (LRIs) for urban development-induced rural displacement and resettlement in India: a Delphi technique

被引:0
作者
Singh, Ishkiran [1 ]
Muhuri, Soumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Planning & Architecture, TIIR Bldg, Rourkela 769008, Odisha, India
关键词
Urban development; Resettlement; Rural households; Livelihood resilience; Experts' opinion; Delphi technique; PROJECT-INDUCED DISPLACEMENT; HUMAN-RIGHTS; LAND-USE; RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT; RISKS;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-05371-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Livelihood recovery, a well-researched issue while a natural disaster, has often been overlooked in the case of other man-made disasters, such as displacement and resettlement caused by urban development projects. Although government institutions/organizations initiated various interventions to combat the externalities of such projects and make the affected people more resilient, a holistic approach is lacking. This study attempts to identify livelihood recovery interventions (LRIs) based on different mechanisms of livelihood resilience for the people affected by urban development projects. Following a literature review and field visit, an initial list of seventy-three LRIs under fifteen mechanisms was prepared. Then, a panel of experts from India was invited to participate in a Delphi technique to check the interventions' applicability and determine additional context-specific interventions to attain livelihood resilience in the Indian context. The results show that maximum interventions related to (i) empowering the people in rural areas, especially for their active participation in the implementation of the development project; (ii) additional facilities to reduce outmigration; (iii) long-term strategies by the government to achieve sustainability are the most relevant, as gained the consensus with aggregate preference 90%, in three rounds of Delphi. These results highlight the directions for policy-makers and planners in designing and managing livelihood recovering activities to achieve livelihood resilience.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Households, livelihoods and mining-induced displacement and resettlement
    Adam, A. B.
    Owen, John R.
    Kemp, Deanna
    [J]. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 2 (03): : 581 - 589
  • [2] Development-driven forced displacement and compensation-based resettlement: experiences from the Jamuna multi-purpose bridge project
    Al Atahar, Syed
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2014, 24 (02) : 258 - 271
  • [3] Alinovi L., 2010, Promoting Resilience through Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa, P28, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU11030907
  • [4] Alinovi L., 2009, Measuring household resilience to food insecurity: application to Palestinian households
  • [5] Determining Sustainability Assessment Indicators for the Holy City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia
    Anisurrahman, Mohammad
    Alshuwaikhat, Habib M.
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 44 (05) : 5165 - 5178
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, Pub. L. No. 04/0007/2003-13, DOI [10.29320/jnpglr.38.1.4, DOI 10.29320/JNPGLR.38.1.4]
  • [7] Livelihood resilience to environmental changes in areas of Kenya and Cameroon: a comparative analysis
    Awazi, Nyong Princely
    Quandt, Amy
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 165 (1-2)
  • [8] Urban-rural linkages: effective solutions for achieving sustainable development in Ghana from an SDG interlinkage perspective
    Baffoe, Gideon
    Zhou, Xin
    Moinuddin, Mustafa
    Somanje, Albert Novas
    Kuriyama, Akihisa
    Mohan, Geetha
    Saito, Osamu
    Takeuchi, Kazuhiko
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (04) : 1341 - 1362
  • [9] An empirical assessment of rural livelihood assets from gender perspective: evidence from Ghana
    Baffoe, Gideon
    Matsuda, Hirotaka
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (03) : 815 - 828
  • [10] The Delphi method: gathering expert opinion in religious education
    Baumfield, Vivienne M.
    Conroy, James C.
    Davis, Robert A.
    Lundie, David C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION, 2012, 34 (01) : 5 - 19