Pollution loads in the middle-lower Yangtze river by coupling water quality models with machine learning

被引:2
作者
Huang, Sheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xia, Jun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wang, Yueling [4 ]
Wang, Gangsheng [1 ,2 ]
She, Dunxian [1 ,2 ]
Lei, Jiarui [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Inst Water Carbon Cycles & Carbon Neutral, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117578, Singapore
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water quality model; Machine learning; Pollution loads; The Yangtze River; Anthropogenic activities; Gated recurrent unit; COEFFICIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2024.122191
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pollution control and environmental protection of the Yangtze River have received major attention in China. However, modeling the river's pollution load remains challenging due to limited monitoring and unclear spatiotemporal distribution of pollution sources. Specifically, anthropogenic activities' contribution to the pollution have been underestimated in previous research. Here, we coupled a hydrodynamic-based water quality (HWQ) model with a machine learning (ML) model, namely attention-based Gated Recurrent Unit, to decipher the daily pollution loads (i.e., chemical oxygen demand, COD; total phosphorus, TP) and their sources in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River from 2014 to 2018. The coupled HWQ-ML model outperformed the standalone ML model with KGE values ranging 0.77-0.91 for COD and 0.47-0.64 for TP, while also reducing parameter uncertainty. When examining the relative contributions at the Middle Yangtze River Hankou cross-section, we observed that the main stream and tributaries, lateral anthropogenic discharges, and parameter uncertainty contributed 15, 66, and 19% to COD, and 58, 35, and 7% to TP, respectively. For the Lower Yangtze River Datong cross-section, the contributions were 6, 69, and 25% for COD and 41, 42, and 17% for TP. According to the attention weights of the coupled model, the primary drivers of lateral anthropogenic pollution sources, in descending order of importance, were temperature, date, and precipitation, reflecting seasonal pollution discharge, industrial effluent, and first flush effect and combined sewer overflows, respectively. This study emphasizes the synergy between physical modeling and machine learning, offering new insights into pollution load dynamics in the Yangtze River.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Contribution rates analysis for sources apportionment to special river sections in Yangtze River Basin
    Bai, Hui
    Chen, Yan
    Wang, Yonggui
    Song, Zhen
    Tong, Hongjin
    Wei, Yao
    Yu, Qing
    Xu, Ziyi
    Yang, Shuihua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 600
  • [2] Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
    Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro
    Diaz-Rodriguez, Natalia
    Del Ser, Javier
    Bennetot, Adrien
    Tabik, Siham
    Barbado, Alberto
    Garcia, Salvador
    Gil-Lopez, Sergio
    Molina, Daniel
    Benjamins, Richard
    Chatila, Raja
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 58 : 82 - 115
  • [3] ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
    Basiri, Mohammad Ehsan
    Nemati, Shahla
    Abdar, Moloud
    Cambria, Erik
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2021, 115 : 279 - 294
  • [4] Benedini M., 2013, WATER QUALITY MODELL, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5509-3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5509-3]
  • [5] Strengthening efficient usage, protection, and restoration of Yangtze River shoreline
    Chen, Da
    Hou, Li-jun
    Liao, Ying-di
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (04) : 257 - 259
  • [6] Comparative analysis of surface water quality prediction performance and identification of key water parameters using different machine learning models based on big data
    Chen, Kangyang
    Chen, Hexia
    Zhou, Chuanlong
    Huang, Yichao
    Qi, Xiangyang
    Shen, Ruqin
    Liu, Fengrui
    Zuo, Min
    Zou, Xinyi
    Wang, Jinfeng
    Zhang, Yan
    Chen, Da
    Chen, Xingguo
    Deng, Yongfeng
    Ren, Hongqiang
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 171 (171)
  • [7] Seasonality in river export of nitrogen: A modelling approach for the Yangtze River
    Chen, Xuanjing
    Strokal, Maryna
    Kroeze, Carolien
    Ma, Lin
    Shen, Zhenyao
    Wu, Jiechen
    Chen, Xinping
    Shi, Xiaojun
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 671 : 1282 - 1292
  • [8] China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, 2002, HJ/T 91-2002
  • [9] Sizing first flush pollutant loading of stormwater runoff in tropical urban catchments
    Chow, Ming Fai
    Yusop, Zulkifli
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 72 (10) : 4047 - 4058
  • [10] Applicability of water quality models around the world-a review
    da Silva Burigato Costa, Cassia Monteiro
    Marques, Leidiane da Silva
    Almeida, Aleska Kaufmann
    Leite, Izabel Rodrigues
    de Almeida, Isabel Kaufmann
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (36) : 36141 - 36162