Potential use of Six Sigma metrics in the quality control review of hospital glucose meters

被引:0
作者
Huang, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Loveday, Callie [2 ]
Vincent, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Hlth Sci Ctr, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Glucose meter; Point-of-care testing; Quality control; Quality improvement; Six Sigma metrics; POINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36651
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aim: This study applied Six Sigma metrics to facilitate the quality control (QC) review for hospital glucose meters. Materials and methods: QC data from a period of six months on all hospital glucose meters were extracted from the data management system. Sigma values for each meter at two QC levels were calculated and evaluated each month by combining the imprecision, the absolute bias between the meter mean and all-meter mean, and the standards from ISO 15179:2013. The effectiveness of using Sigma values in identifying meters with possible quality problems for further LeveyJennings QC chart review was assessed. Results: More than 80 % of the meter's Sigma values within the six months were greater than 4 at either QC level. At the high QC level, twice as many Sigma values were below 4 than the low QC level. Including Sigma values 4, 3.5 or 3 in the criteria for the QC review reduced the number of chart review to 32.8 %, 11.2 % or 3.5 %, respectively. Conclusions: The majority of the glucose meters examined in this study demonstrated optimal Sigma values. The Sigma metrics-based approach could be a valuable tool to guide an effective QC review of glucose meters for quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Accreditation Canada Diagnostics, 2023, Medical laboratory accreditation requirements, P148
[2]  
ANDERSON YJ, 1981, AM J MED TECHNOL, V47, P321
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ISO 15197:2013
[4]   Comparison of Accuracy Guidelines for Hospital Glucose Meters [J].
Bowman, Cynthia Foss ;
Nichols, James H. .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (03) :546-552
[5]   The accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems according to ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 criteria [J].
Chen, Huizhen ;
Yao, Qingtao ;
Dong, Yang ;
Tang, Zhimei ;
Li, Ruiying ;
Cai, Baochao ;
Wang, Ruili ;
Chen, Qiu .
PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2019, 13 (03) :252-258
[6]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2016, Statistical Quality Control for Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Principles and Definitions
[7]  
Approved Guideline (C24-A4)
[8]  
Erasmus Rajiv, 2021, EJIFCC, V32, P190
[9]   Evaluating Laboratory Performance on Point-of-Care Glucose Testing with Six Sigma Metric for 151 Institutions in China [J].
Fei, Yang ;
Wang, Wei ;
He, Falin ;
Zhong, Kun ;
Wang, Zhiguo .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 17 (10) :745-754
[10]   Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements [J].
Freckmann, Guido ;
Baumstark, Annette ;
Jendrike, Nina ;
Rittmeyer, Delia ;
Pleus, Stefan ;
Haug, Cornelia .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 19 (04) :246-254