Automated Fairness Testing with Representative Sampling

被引:0
|
作者
Karakas, Umutcan [1 ]
Tosun, Ayse [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PREDICTIVE MODELS AND DATA ANALYTICS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROMISE 2023 | 2023年
关键词
fairness testing; representative sampling; machine learning; K-SVD; SPARSE;
D O I
10.1145/3617555.3617871
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The issue of fairness testing in machine learning models has become popular due to rising concerns about potential bias and discrimination, as these models continue to permeate end-user applications. However, achieving an accurate and reliable measurement of the fairness performance of machine learning models remains a substantial challenge. Representative sampling plays a pivotal role in ensuring accurate fairness assessments and providing insight into the underlying dynamics of data, unlike biased or random sampling approaches. In our study, we introduce our approach, namely RS-Fair, which adopts the representative sampling method to comprehensively evaluate the fairness performance of a trained machine learning model. Our research findings on two datasets indicate that RSFair yields more accurate and reliable results, thus improving the efficiency of subsequent search steps, and ultimately the fairness performance of the model. With the usage of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and K-Singular Value Decomposition (K-SVD) algorithms for representative sampling, RSFair significantly improves the detection of discriminatory inputs by 76% and the fairness performance by 53% compared to other search-based approaches in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Notions of Fairness in Automated Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Open Issues
    Yousefi, Yasaman
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE, EGOVIS 2022, 2022, 13429 : 3 - 17
  • [32] Boundary-guided Black-box Fairness Testing
    Yin, Ziliiang
    Zhao, Wentian
    Song, Tian
    2024 IEEE 48TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, COMPSAC 2024, 2024, : 1230 - 1239
  • [33] Explanation-Guided Fairness Testing through Genetic Algorithm
    Fan, Ming
    Wei, Wenying
    Jin, Wuxia
    Yang, Zijiang
    Liu, Ting
    2022 ACM/IEEE 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2022), 2022, : 871 - 882
  • [34] Appropriate rather than representative sampling, based on acceptable levels of uncertainty
    Ramsey, MH
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2002, 7 (07) : 274 - 280
  • [35] Fast Representative Sampling in Large-Scale Online Social Networks
    Cai, Guangren
    Lu, Gang
    Guo, Junxia
    Ling, Cheng
    Li, Ruiqi
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 77106 - 77119
  • [36] On representative sampling and reliable chemical characterization in thermal biomass conversion studies
    Thy, P.
    Esbensen, K. H.
    Jenkins, B. M.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (11) : 1513 - 1519
  • [37] Representative Sampling Implementation in Online VFA/TIC Monitoring for Anaerobic Digestion
    Wilches, Camilo
    Vaske, Maik
    Hartmann, Kilian
    Nelles, Michael
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (06):
  • [38] Fairness Evaluation in Deepfake Detection Models using Metamorphic Testing
    Pu, Muxin
    Kuan, Meng Yi
    Lim, Nyee Thoang
    Chong, Chun Yong
    Lim, Mei Kuan
    2022 IEEE/ACM 7TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METAMORPHIC TESTING (MET 2022), 2022, : 7 - 14
  • [39] Bias behind the Wheel: Fairness Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems
    Li, Xinyue
    Chen, Zhenpeng
    Zhang, Jie m.
    Sarro, Federica
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Xuanzhe
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND METHODOLOGY, 2025, 34 (03)
  • [40] Rapid earthquake loss assessment based on machine learning and representative sampling
    Stojadinovic, Zoran
    Kovacevic, Milos
    Marinkovic, Dejan
    Stojadinovic, Bozidar
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2022, 38 (01) : 152 - 177