Perfusion area versus volume of the DIEP flap: A multivariable analysis of perforator and flap characteristics for estimation of perfusion area and volume

被引:2
|
作者
Park, Jin-Woo [1 ]
Kang, Jung-Min [1 ]
Yoo, Kyungeun [2 ]
Woo, Kyong-Je [2 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Mokdong Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
DIEP flap; Perfusion zone; Flap volume; Perforator; Perfusion; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAPHY; MEDIAL ROW PERFORATORS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FAT NECROSIS; VASCULAR ANATOMY; VESSELS; REDUCTION; WEIGHT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The extent of perfusion of a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a primary concern for surgeons. This study aimed to determine whether the flap area or volume can be estimated using perforator and flap characteristics. Methods: Intraoperative flap perfusion was assessed using indocyanine green angiography in patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between November 2018 and February 2023. The area perfused by a single dominant perforator was delineated on the surface of the flap and measured using the ImageJ software. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate the 'perfusion ratio,' defined as the perfused area divided by the total flap area. Potential predictor variables included flap size (cm(2)), flap thickness (mm), perforator diameter (mm), perforator rows (medial/lateral), vertical location of perforator (at or above/below the umbilicus), and perforator eccentricity (vertical distance from upper flap margin to perforator, cm). Results: In total, 101 patients were included in this analysis. The mean 'perfusion ratio' was 67.8% +/- 11.5%, predicted by perforator diameter (p = 0.022) and vertical location below umbilicus (p < 0.001) with positive correlations and negatively correlated with flap thickness (p = 0.003) in the multivariable analysis. Both perfusion area and weight were predicted by perforator diameter, vertical location of perforator, flap size, and flap thickness (p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination (adjusted R-2) for prediction of perfusion weight was higher than that for the perfusion area (75.5% vs. 69.4%). Conclusions: Flap volume, rather than area, is determined by a perforator of a given diameter and location. (c) 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] The triangular prism approximation method for volume estimation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction
    Kato, Sayuri
    Mori, Hiroki
    Koga, Haruka
    Uemura, Noriko
    Tanaka, Kentaro
    MICROSURGERY, 2023, 43 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [12] Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps
    Jeong, Woonhyeok
    Lee, Seongwon
    Kim, Junhyung
    BREAST, 2018, 38 : 45 - 51
  • [13] Three-dimensional Analysis of How Radiation Affects Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Volume, Projection, and Position in Breast Cancer Reconstruction
    Craig, Elizabeth Stirling
    Lentz, Rachel
    Srinivasa, Dhivya
    Chuang, Carolyn
    Walker, Marc E.
    Higgins, Susan A.
    Salomon, Jeffrey
    Fusi, Stefano
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 81 (02) : 235 - 239
  • [14] Computed tomography angiography (CTA) assisted preoperative planning and volume calculation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction
    Ronen G.
    Blachar A.
    Abelow A.
    Gur E.
    Barnea Y.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2017, 40 (5) : 441 - 446
  • [15] Reply: A Combined Anatomical and Clinical Study for Quantitative Analysis of the Microcirculation in the Classic Perfusion Zones of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap
    Rahmanian-Schwarz, Afshin
    Amr, Amro
    Rothenberger, Jens
    Hirt, Bernhard
    Schaller, Hans-Eberhard
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (03) : 822 - 823
  • [16] A Combined Anatomical and Clinical Study for Quantitative Analysis of the Microcirculation in the Classic Perfusion Zones of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap
    Rozen, Warren M.
    Whitaker, Iain S.
    Ashton, Mark W.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (03) : 821 - 822
  • [17] Innovative DIEP flap perfusion evaluation tool: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of indocyanine green-based fluorescence angiography with the SPY-Q proprietary software
    Girard, Noemie
    Delomenie, Myriam
    Malhaire, Caroline
    Sebbag, Delphine
    Roulot, Aurelie
    Sabaila, Anne
    Couturaud, Benoit
    Feron, Jean-Guillaume
    Reyal, Fabien
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [18] Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap safety profile in slim versus non-slim BMI patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Michelle Y. L.
    Onggo, James
    Serag, Saleh
    Phan, Kevin
    Dusseldorp, Joseph R.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (07) : 2180 - 2189
  • [19] Role of perfusion CT in differentiating between various cerebral masses using normalized permeability surface area product and cerebral blood volume
    Lee, Youn-Joo
    Ahn, Kook-Jin
    Kim, Bum-Soo
    Yoo, Won-Jong
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (06) : 680 - 687