Perfusion area versus volume of the DIEP flap: A multivariable analysis of perforator and flap characteristics for estimation of perfusion area and volume

被引:2
|
作者
Park, Jin-Woo [1 ]
Kang, Jung-Min [1 ]
Yoo, Kyungeun [2 ]
Woo, Kyong-Je [2 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Mokdong Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
DIEP flap; Perfusion zone; Flap volume; Perforator; Perfusion; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAPHY; MEDIAL ROW PERFORATORS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FAT NECROSIS; VASCULAR ANATOMY; VESSELS; REDUCTION; WEIGHT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The extent of perfusion of a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a primary concern for surgeons. This study aimed to determine whether the flap area or volume can be estimated using perforator and flap characteristics. Methods: Intraoperative flap perfusion was assessed using indocyanine green angiography in patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between November 2018 and February 2023. The area perfused by a single dominant perforator was delineated on the surface of the flap and measured using the ImageJ software. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate the 'perfusion ratio,' defined as the perfused area divided by the total flap area. Potential predictor variables included flap size (cm(2)), flap thickness (mm), perforator diameter (mm), perforator rows (medial/lateral), vertical location of perforator (at or above/below the umbilicus), and perforator eccentricity (vertical distance from upper flap margin to perforator, cm). Results: In total, 101 patients were included in this analysis. The mean 'perfusion ratio' was 67.8% +/- 11.5%, predicted by perforator diameter (p = 0.022) and vertical location below umbilicus (p < 0.001) with positive correlations and negatively correlated with flap thickness (p = 0.003) in the multivariable analysis. Both perfusion area and weight were predicted by perforator diameter, vertical location of perforator, flap size, and flap thickness (p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination (adjusted R-2) for prediction of perfusion weight was higher than that for the perfusion area (75.5% vs. 69.4%). Conclusions: Flap volume, rather than area, is determined by a perforator of a given diameter and location. (c) 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Analysis of Perfusion in the DIEP Flap: Role of the Location of the Perforator, Umbilicus, and Midline Crossing-Over Vessel
    Min, Kyunghyun
    Oh, So Min
    Kim, Eun Key
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Han, Hyun Ho
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (06) : 1146 - 1155
  • [2] Perforator Characteristics and Impact on Postoperative Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aravind, Pathik
    Colakoglu, Salih
    Bhoopalam, Myan
    Ibrahim, Ahmed
    Mathes, David
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    Mureau, Marc
    Reddy, Sashank
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2023, 39 (02) : 138 - 147
  • [3] Analyzing the relationship between perforator pattern and perfusion of DIEP flap using indocyanine green-based fluorescence angiography
    Jun, Daiwon
    Kim, Byeol
    Park, Min Suk
    Ahn, Ma Rhip
    Paik, Pill Sun
    Rhu, Jiyoung
    Lee, Jung Ho
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 96 : 50 - 52
  • [4] Influence of vertical location and spacing of perforators on perfusion in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: quantitative analysis using indocyanine green angiography
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Mi Kyung
    Woo, Kyong-Je
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (12) : 1851 - 1863
  • [5] DIEP flap perfusion assessment using microdialysis versus Doppler ultrasonography: A comparative study
    Sorotos, Michail
    Firmani, Guido
    Tornambene, Roberta
    Marrella, Domenico
    Paolini, Guido
    Santanelli di Pompeo, Fabio
    MICROSURGERY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [6] Estimation of Contralateral Perfusion in the DIEP Flap by Scoring the Midline-Crossing Vessels in Computed Tomographic Angiography
    Han, Hyun Ho
    Kang, Min Kyu
    Choe, Jooae
    Jaikel, Karina
    Kim, Eun Key
    Cha, Han Gyu
    Choi, Eun Jeong
    Eom, Jin Sup
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (04) : 697E - 705E
  • [7] Optimizing Perforator Selection: A Multivariable Analysis of Predictors for Fat Necrosis and Abdominal Morbidity in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Hembd, Austin
    Teotia, Sumeet S.
    Zhu, Hong
    Haddock, Nicholas T.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (03) : 583 - 592
  • [8] Flap perfusion assessment with indocyanine green angiography in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Zhaojian
    Jiao, Ling
    Chen, Siliang
    Li, Zhijin
    Xiao, Yiding
    Du, Fengzhou
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    MICROSURGERY, 2023, 43 (06) : 627 - 638
  • [9] A Combined Anatomical and Clinical Study for Quantitative Analysis of the Microcirculation in the Classic Perfusion Zones of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap
    Rahmanian-Schwarz, Afshin
    Rothenberger, Jens
    Hirt, Bernhard
    Luz, Oliver
    Schaller, Hans-Eberhard
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (02) : 505 - 513
  • [10] A Postoperative Analysis of Perfusion Dynamics in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction A Noninvasive Quantitative Measurement of Flap Oxygen Saturation and Blood Flow
    Rahmanian-Schwarz, Afshin
    Rothenberger, Jens
    Amr, Amro
    Jaminet, Patrick
    Schaller, Hans-Eberhard
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (05) : 535 - 539