Commercial Synovial Antigen Testing is Inferior to Traditional Culture for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:1
作者
Tarabichi, Saad [1 ]
Johnson, Roseann M. [2 ]
Quinlan, Nicole D. [2 ]
Dennis, Douglas A. [2 ]
Parvizi, Javad [3 ]
Jennings, Jason M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] AdventHlth Porter, Colorado Joint Replacement Orthoped Sugery, Denver, CO USA
[3] Acibadem Univ Hosp, Int Joint Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
diagnosis; periprosthetic joint infection; culture negative; microbial identification panel; revision total knee arthroplasty; NEXT-GENERATION; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.067
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite its limitations, a culture remains the "gold standard" for pathogen identification in patients who have periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, a synovial fluid antigen test has been introduced by a commercial entity. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the accuracy of the antigen test in the diagnosis of PJI. Methods: This retrospective study identified 613 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty who had undergone preoperative synovial fluid analysis. A PJI was defined using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Patients who had an extended period (> 180 days) from aspiration to revision procedure (n = 62), those presenting within 90 days of their index arthroplasty procedure (n = 17), and patients who had an inconclusive ICM score (n = 8) were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, we examined the utility of the microbial identification (MID) antigen test and any positive culture (either preoperative or intraoperative) in the diagnosis of PJI. Results: A total of 526 patients were included. Of these, 125 (23.8%) were ICM positive and 401 (76.2%) were ICM negative. Culture demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864, sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 97.5%. On the other hand, the MID test exhibited an AUC of 0.802, sensitivity of 61.6%, and specificity of 98.8%. The AUC of culture was significantly higher than that of the MID test (P = .037). The MID test was positive in 41.9% of culture-negative PJI cases. We also observed a high rate of discordance (29.7%) when both culture and the MID test were positive in the ICM-positive group. Conclusions: Synovial fluid antigen testing does not provide additional clinical benefit when compared to traditional cultures for the diagnosis of PJI. The antigen test had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI and a relatively high rate of discordance with culture. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S296 / S302
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] How reliable is the next generation of multiplex-PCR for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection compared to the MSIS criteria? Still missing the ideal test
    Lausmann, Christian
    Kolle, Kim Niklas
    Citak, Mustafa
    Abdelaziz, Hussein
    Schulmeyer, Juan
    Delgado, Gio D.
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Gebauer, Matthias
    Zahar, Akos
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 30 (1_SUPPL) : 72 - 77
  • [12] The diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infections
    Moran, E.
    Byren, I.
    Atkins, B. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 : iii45 - iii54
  • [13] Diagnosis and management of infected arthroplasty
    Pannu, Tejbir S.
    Villa, Jesus M.
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    [J]. SICOT-J, 2021, 7
  • [14] The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria
    Parvizi, Javad
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Goswami, Karan
    Higuera, Carlos
    Della Valle, Craig
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Shohat, Noam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (05) : 1309 - +
  • [15] Preoperative Aspiration Culture for Preoperative Diagnosis of Infection in Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
    Qu, Xinhua
    Zhai, Zanjing
    Wu, Chuanlong
    Jin, Fangchun
    Li, Haowei
    Wang, Lei
    Liu, Guangwang
    Liu, Xuqiang
    Wang, Wengang
    Li, Huiwu
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Zhu, Zhenan
    Dai, Kerong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (11) : 3830 - 3834
  • [16] Preoperative synovial fluid culture poorly predicts the pathogen causing periprosthetic joint infection
    Schulz, Philipp
    Dlaska, Constantin E.
    Perka, Carsten
    Trampuz, Andrej
    Renz, Nora
    [J]. INFECTION, 2021, 49 (03) : 427 - 436
  • [17] Tan Timothy L, 2018, JB JS Open Access, V3, pe0060, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00060
  • [18] Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing
    Tarabichi, Majd
    Shohat, Noam
    Goswami, Karan
    Alvand, Abtin
    Silibovsky, Randi
    Belden, Katherine
    Parvizi, Javad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [19] Plasma D-Dimer Is Noninferior to Serum C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Tarabichi, Saad
    Goh, Graham S.
    Baker, Colin M.
    Chisari, Emanuele
    Shahi, Alisina
    Parvizi, Javad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (07) : 501 - 508
  • [20] 2022 American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Symposium: Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Tarabichi, Saad
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    Parvizi, Javad
    Polkowski, Gregory G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S45 - S49