Resilient riverine social-ecological systems: A new paradigm to meet global conservation targets

被引:2
作者
Perry, Denielle [1 ]
Praskievicz, Sarah [2 ]
McManamay, Ryan [3 ]
Saxena, Alark [4 ]
Grimm, Kerry [5 ,6 ]
Zegre, Nicolas [7 ]
Bair, Lucas [8 ]
Ruddell, Benjamin L. [9 ]
Rushforth, Richard [9 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Earth & Sustainabil, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Geog Environm & Sustainabil, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Waco, TX USA
[4] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[5] Ecoculture, Flagstaff, AZ USA
[6] Human Environm Connect, Flagstaff, AZ USA
[7] West Virginia Univ, Forestry & Nat Resources, Morgantown, WV USA
[8] US Geol Survey, Southwest Biol Sci Ctr, Flagstaff, AZ USA
[9] No Arizona Univ, Sch Informat Comp & Cyber Syst, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
来源
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER | 2024年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
30; x; connectivity; freshwater; networks; resilience; SES; FRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITY; LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; HYDROLOGIC CLASSIFICATION; LINKING BIODIVERSITY; RESPONSE DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; PROTECTED AREAS; LAND FACETS;
D O I
10.1002/wat2.1753
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity set forth the 30 x 30 target, an agenda for countries to protect at least 30% of their terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas by 2030. With <6 years to reach that goal, riverine conservation professionals are faced with the difficult decision of prioritizing which rivers or river segments should be conserved (protected and/or restored). While incorporating resilience into conservation planning is essential for enhancing, restoring, and maintaining the vital riverine ecosystem services (ES) most threatened by climate change and other environmental and human stresses, this paradigm is at odds with traditional conservation approaches that are either opportunistic or reactionary, where only unique and highly visible ecosystems have been prioritized. Barriers to implementing resilience-based riverine conservation planning include: (1) difficulties in conceptualizing and quantifying resilience; (2) insufficient consideration of the social components of riverine systems; (3) the inapplicability of terrestrial-only conservation models to aquatic systems; and (4) the traditional ad hoc and opportunistic approach to conservation. To overcome these barriers, we propose a resilience-based riverine conservation framework that includes: (1) assessing riverine resilience using indicator frameworks; (2) considering rivers as dynamically coupled social-ecological systems; (3) explicitly incorporating terrestrial-aquatic network connectivity into conservation decision-making; and (4) strategic systems planning using a novel resilience-conservation matrix as a tool. This framework has the potential to transform conservation practices around the globe to more effectively protect river systems and enhance their resilience to climate change and human development. This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Science of Water > Water and Environmental Change Human Water > Water Governance
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient and resilient governance of social-ecological systems
    Erickson, Adam
    AMBIO, 2015, 44 (05) : 343 - 352
  • [2] Resilient Social Relationships and Collaboration in the Management of Social-Ecological Systems
    Nkhata, Abraham B.
    Breen, Charles M.
    Freimund, Wayne A.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2008, 13 (01):
  • [3] Feedbacks between Conservation and Social-Ecological Systems
    Miller, Brian W.
    Caplow, Susan C.
    Leslie, Paul W.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 218 - 227
  • [4] A framework for conceptualizing and modeling social-ecological systems for conservation research
    Anderies, John M.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Clements, Hayley S.
    Lade, Steven J.
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Chawla, Sivee
    Mueller, Birgit
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 275
  • [5] Wildlife Conservation on Private Land: A Social-Ecological Systems Study
    Taylor, Matthew
    Brook, Barry
    Johnson, Christopher
    de Little, Siobhan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 73 (05) : 1049 - 1071
  • [6] Actors' diversity and the resilience of social-ecological systems to global change
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Huber, Sibyl H.
    Huber, Robert
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (04) : 290 - 297
  • [7] Editorial: Social-ecological urbanism: Developing discourse, institutions and urban form for the design of resilient social-ecological systems in cities
    Pont, Meta Berghauser
    Barthel, Stephan
    Colding, Johan
    Gren, Asa
    Legeby, Ann
    Marcus, Lars
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8
  • [8] Small Parks as Local Social-Ecological Systems Contributing to Conservation of Small Isolated and Ephemeral Wetlands
    Pitt, Amber L.
    Howard, Joanna Hawley
    Baldwin, Robert F.
    Baldwin, Elizabeth D.
    Brown, Bryan L.
    NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (04) : 237 - 249
  • [9] Social-Ecological Systems Insights for Navigating the Dynamics of the Anthropocene
    Reyers, Belinda
    Folke, Carl
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    Biggs, Reinette
    Galaz, Victor
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 43, 2018, 43 : 267 - 289
  • [10] Assessing the resilient provision of ecosystem services by social-ecological systems: introduction and theory
    Sarkki, Simo
    Ficko, Andrej
    Wielgolaski, Frans E.
    Abraham, Eleni M.
    Bratanova-Doncheva, Svetla
    Grunewald, Karsten
    Hofgaard, Annika
    Holtmeier, Friedrich-Karl
    Kyriazopoulos, Apostolos P.
    Broll, Gabriele
    Nijnik, Maria
    Sutinen, Marja-Liisa
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2017, 73 (1-2) : 7 - 15