rAbDesFlow: a novel workflow for computational recombinant antibody design for healthcare engineering

被引:0
|
作者
Krishnan, Sowmya Ramaswamy [1 ]
Sharma, Divya [1 ]
Nazeer, Yasin [1 ]
Bose, Mayilvahanan [2 ]
Rajkumar, Thangarajan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Jayaraman, Guhan [1 ]
Madaboosi, Narayanan [1 ]
Gromiha, M. Michael [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Bhupat & Jyoti Mehta Sch Biosci, Dept Biotechnol, Chennai 600036, India
[2] Canc Inst WIA, Dept Mol Oncol, Chennai 600020, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Appl Mech & Biomed Engn, Chennai 600036, India
[4] MedGenome, Bengaluru 560099, Karnataka, India
[5] Amrita Inst Med Sci, Dept Nanosci & Mol Med, Kochi 682041, Kerala, India
[6] Tokyo Inst Technol, Sch Comp, Int Res Frontiers Initiat, Yokohama 2268501, Japan
[7] Natl Univ Singapore NUS, Sch Comp, Singapore 119077, Singapore
关键词
rAbDesFlow; recombinant antibody engineering; computational workflow; CA-125; ovarian cancer; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; PREDICTION; SERVER; AFFINITY; THERAPY; EPITOPE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1093/abt/tbae018
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Recombinant antibodies (rAbs) have emerged as a promising solution to tackle antigen specificity, enhancement of immunogenic potential and versatile functionalization to treat human diseases. The development of single chain variable fragments has helped accelerate treatment in cancers and viral infections, due to their favorable pharmacokinetics and human compatibility. However, designing rAbs is traditionally viewed as a genetic engineering problem, with phage display and cell free systems playing a major role in sequence selection for gene synthesis. The process of antibody engineering involves complex and time-consuming laboratory techniques, which demand substantial resources and expertise. The success rate of obtaining desired antibody candidates through experimental approaches can be modest, necessitating iterative cycles of selection and optimization. With ongoing advancements in technology, in silico design of diverse antibody libraries, screening and identification of potential candidates for in vitro validation can be accelerated. To meet this need, we have developed rAbDesFlow, a unified computational workflow for recombinant antibody engineering with open-source programs and tools for ease of implementation. The workflow encompasses five computational modules to perform antigen selection, antibody library generation, antigen and antibody structure modeling, antigen-antibody interaction modeling, structure analysis, and consensus ranking of potential antibody sequences for synthesis and experimental validation. The proposed workflow has been demonstrated through design of rAbs for the ovarian cancer antigen Mucin-16 (CA-125). This approach can serve as a blueprint for designing similar engineered molecules targeting other biomarkers, allowing for a simplified adaptation to different cancer types or disease-specific antigens. Statement of Significance: A computational workflow, rAbDesFlow, was developed for template-based humanized recombinant antibody design. The workflow utilizes open-sourced databases and tools with existing antibody sequences as templates. This approach can serve as a blueprint for designing similar engineered molecules targeting other biomarkers, allowing for a straightforward and simplified adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agonist antibody discovery: Experimental, computational, and rational engineering approaches
    Schardt, John S.
    Jhajj, Harkamal S.
    O'Meara, Ryen L.
    Lwo, Timon S.
    Smith, Matthew D.
    Tessier, Peter M.
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2022, 27 (01) : 31 - 48
  • [2] Computational Workflow to Design Novel Vaccine Candidates and Small-Molecule Therapeutics for Schistosomiasis
    Balogun, Emmanuel Oluwadare
    Joseph, Gideon Ibrahim
    Olabode, Samuel Charles
    Dayaso, Naziru Abdulkadir
    Danazumi, Ammar Usman
    Bashford-Rogers, Rachael
    Mckerrow, James H.
    Jeelani, Ghulam
    Caffrey, Conor R.
    PATHOGENS, 2024, 13 (10):
  • [3] Recombinant IgE antibody engineering to target EGFR
    Spillner, Edzard
    Plum, Melanie
    Blank, Simon
    Miehe, Michaela
    Singer, Josef
    Braren, Ingke
    CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2012, 61 (09) : 1565 - 1573
  • [4] RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): A general framework for computational antibody design
    Adolf-Bryfogle, Jared
    Kalyuzhniy, Oleks
    Kubitz, Michael
    Weitzner, Brian D.
    Hu, Xiaozhen
    Adachi, Yumiko
    Schief, William R.
    Dunbrack, Roland L., Jr.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (04)
  • [5] Protein engineering approaches for antibody fragments: directed evolution and rational design approaches
    Arslan, Merve
    Karadag, Dilara
    Kalyoncu, Sibel
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY, 2019, 43 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [6] IsAb: a computational protocol for antibody design
    Liang, Tianjian
    Chen, Hui
    Yuan, Jiayi
    Jiang, Chen
    Hao, Yixuan
    Wang, Yuanqiang
    Feng, Zhiwei
    Xie, Xiang-Qun
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (05)
  • [7] The effects of Antibody Engineering CH and CL in Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab recombinant models: Impact on antibody production and antigen-binding
    Lua, Wai-Heng
    Ling, Wei-Li
    Yeo, Joshua Yi
    Poh, Jun-Jie
    Lane, David Philip
    Gan, Samuel Ken-En
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [8] Enhancing recombinant antibody performance by optimally engineering its format
    Murphy, Caroline
    Stack, Edwina
    Krivelo, Svetlana
    Breheny, Mark
    Ma, Hui
    O'Kennedy, Richard
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 463 : 127 - 133
  • [9] Computational methods in metabolic engineering for strain design
    Long, Matthew R.
    Ong, Wai Kit
    Reed, Jennifer L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 34 : 135 - 141
  • [10] Computational design and improvement of a broad influenza virus HA stem targeting antibody
    Duan, Huarui
    Chi, Xiaojing
    Yang, Xuehua
    Pan, Shengnan
    Liu, Xiuying
    Gao, Peixiang
    Zhang, Fangyuan
    Zhang, Xinhui
    Dong, Xuemeng
    Liao, Yi
    Yang, Wei
    STRUCTURE, 2025, 33 (03)