Comparison of DIF Detection Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Ptukhin, Yevgeniy [1 ]
Sheng, Yanyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Illinois Univ, Coll Business & Technol, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Comm Quantitat Methods, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
关键词
STANDARDIZATION APPROACH; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RESPONSE THEORY; R PACKAGE; ITEM; AREA;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-55548-0_12
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Differential item functioning (DIF) has been one of the important considerations in measurement practices over the last three decades. Various statistical methods have been developed to detect DIF, and as a result, many simulation studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of two or three methods under different test situations. To have an overall picture on how they compare for tests with dichotomous items with and without DIF, this study carries out a comprehensive comparison of these methods by evaluating their type I error and power rates controlling for sample sizes, test lengths, DIF sizes, and DIF proportions. Results of the study provide a set of guidelines for researchers and practitioners on the use of each DIF detection method in different test situations where uniform or nonuniform DIF is present.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 132
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS
    SEVERANCE, PJ
    KAUFFMAN, CA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (04): : A651 - A651
  • [42] Detection of Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison of Methods
    Nguyen, Nghi Co
    Abdelmalik, Amir
    Moinuddin, Asif
    Osman, Medhat M.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (05) : 823 - 824
  • [43] Comparison of Influenza Virus Detection Methods
    Takahara, Yusuke
    Nakaya, Yuki
    Yasuura, Masato
    Ashiba, Hiroki
    Kumar, Penmetcha K. R.
    Fujimaki, Makoto
    SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2019, 31 (01) : 79 - 87
  • [44] Comparison of methods for the detection of Salmonella in poultry
    Langkabel, N.
    Klose, A.
    Irsigler, H.
    Jaeger, D.
    Braeutigam, L.
    Hafez, H. M.
    Fries, R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (03): : 403 - 408
  • [45] Comparison of Voltage Events Detection Methods
    Bok, Jaromir
    Drapela, Jiri
    11TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2010, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 473 - +
  • [46] A Comparison of Facial Landmark Detection Methods
    Sandikci, Esra Nur
    Eroglu Erdem, Cigdem
    Ulukaya, Sezer
    2018 26TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2018,
  • [47] COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS
    LIYAUYON, MJ
    STAGER, CE
    DAVIS, JR
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1994, 25 (05) : 331 - 333
  • [48] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR CMV DETECTION
    BAJANOWSKI, T
    WIEGAND, P
    BRINKMANN, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 1994, 106 (04) : 219 - 222
  • [49] An empirical comparison of botnet detection methods
    Garcia, S.
    Grill, M.
    Stiborek, J.
    Zunino, A.
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2014, 45 : 100 - 123
  • [50] Comparison of methods for detection of norovirus in oysters
    Schultz, Anna Charlotte
    Saadbye, Peter
    Hoorfar, Jeffrey
    Norrung, Birgit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 114 (03) : 352 - 356