Evaluation of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) equations to predict enteric methane emission from lactating cows fed Mediterranean diets

被引:3
|
作者
Colombini, S. [1 ]
Graziosi, A. Rota [1 ]
Galassi, G. [1 ]
Gislon, G. [1 ]
Crovetto, G. M. [1 ]
Enriquez-Hidalgo, D. [2 ,3 ]
Rapetti, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Ag & Ambientali, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Bristol, Sustainable Agr Sci Dept, Bristol BS8 1TH, England
[3] Rothamsted Res, Sustainable Agr Sci, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
来源
JDS COMMUNICATIONS | 2023年 / 4卷 / 03期
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
CORN-SILAGE; RUMINAL FERMENTATION; MILK-PRODUCTION; ALFALFA SILAGE; DAIRY-COWS; NITROGEN; BALANCE; DIGESTION; MODELS; BARLEY;
D O I
10.3168/jdsc.2022-0240
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The study aimed to evaluate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 2 (2006 and 2019) to predict enteric CH 4 emissions from lactating cows fed Mediterranean diets. The effects of the CH 4 conversion factor (Y m ; CH 4 energy loss as a percentage of gross energy intake) and digestible energy (DE) of the diet were evaluated as model predictors. A data set was created using individual observations derived from 3 in vivo studies on lactating dairy cows housed in respiration chambers and fed diets typical of the Mediterranean region based on silages and hays. Five models using different Y m and DE were evaluated following a Tier 2 approach: (1) average values of Y m (6.5%) and DE (70%) from IPCC (2006); (2) average value of Y m (5.7%) and DE (70.0%) from IPCC (2019; 1YM); (3) Y m = 5.7% and DE measured in vivo (1YMIV); (4) Y m = 5.7 or 6.0%, depending on dietary NDF, and DE = 70% (2YM); and (5) Y m = 5.7 or 6.0%, depending on dietary NDF, and DE measured in vivo (2YMIV). Finally, a Tier 2 model for Mediterranean diets (MED) was derived from the Italian data set (Y m = 5.58%; DE = 69.9% for silage-based diets and 64.8% for hay-based diets) and validated on an independent data set of cows fed Mediterranean diets. The most accurate models tested were 2YMIV, 2YM, and 1YMIV with predictions of 384, 377, and 377 (g of CH 4 /d), respectively, versus the in vivo value of 381. The most precise model was 1YM (slope bias = 1.88%; r = 0.63). Overall, 1YM showed the highest concordance correlation coefficient value (0.579), followed by 1YMIV (0.569). Cross-validation on an independent data set of cows fed Mediterranean diets (corn silage and alfalfa hay) resulted in concordance correlation coefficient of 0.492 and 0.485 for 1YM and MED, respectively. The prediction of MED (397) was more accurate than 1YM (405) in comparison with the corresponding in vivo value of 396 g of CH 4 /d. The results of this study showed that the average values proposed by IPCC (2019) can adequately predict CH 4 emissions from cows fed typical Mediterranean diets. However, the use of specific factors for the Mediterranean area, such as DE, improved the accuracy of the models.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 185
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Comparision of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) system for estimating methane emission from dairy cows
    Nes, S. K.
    Volden, H.
    Krizsan, S. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 : 163 - 163
  • [2] Comparision of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) system for estimating methane emission from dairy cows
    Nes, S. K.
    Volden, H.
    Krizsan, S. J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 163 - 163
  • [3] Comparision of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) system for estimating methane emission from dairy cows
    Nes, S. K.
    Volden, H.
    Krizsan, S. J.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 : 163 - 163
  • [4] Methane production in lactating dairy cows on fat or corn silage rich diets compared to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates
    van Straalen, W. M.
    van Laar, H.
    van den Brand, H.
    ENERGY AND PROTEIN METABOLISM AND NUTRITION, 2007, (124): : 613 - +
  • [7] The Professionalization of Ethics in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from Servant of Science to Ethical Master?
    Skoglund, Annika
    Jensen, Tommy
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 21 (02) : 122 - 130
  • [8] Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission scenarios
    Joos, F
    Prentice, IC
    Sitch, S
    Meyer, R
    Hooss, G
    Plattner, GK
    Gerber, S
    Hasselmann, K
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2001, 15 (04) : 891 - 907
  • [9] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 1 forest biomass estimates from Earth Observation
    Hunka, Neha
    Duncanson, Laura
    Armston, John
    Dubayah, Ralph
    Healey, Sean P.
    Santoro, Maurizio
    May, Paul
    Araza, Arnan
    Bourgoin, Clement
    Montesano, Paul M.
    Neigh, Christopher S. R.
    Grantham, Hedley
    Potapov, Peter
    Turubanova, Svetlana
    Tyukavina, Alexandra
    Richter, Jessica
    Harris, Nancy
    Urbazaev, Mikhail
    Pascual, Adrian
    Suarez, Daniela Requena
    Herold, Martin
    Poulter, Benjamin
    Wilson, Sylvia N.
    Grassi, Giacomo
    Federici, Sandro
    Sanz, Maria J.
    Melo, Joana
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [10] Evaluating Methane Emission Estimates from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Compared to Sentinel-Derived Air-Methane Data
    Wojcik-Gront, Elzbieta
    Wnuk, Agnieszka
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)