Marine Spatial Planning and the loss of traditional power in Fiji and the Cook Islands

被引:0
作者
de Waegh, Roxane [1 ]
Wilson, Nathaniel [2 ]
Watt, Lucas [3 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Coll London UCL, London, England
[3] Chr Michelsen Inst, Bergen, Norway
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
indigenous marine authority; Marine Spatial Planning; legal pluralism; Fiji; Cook Islands; Pacific; LEGAL PLURALISM; PACIFIC; MANAGEMENT; FISHERIES; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGE; ECONOMY; RISE; LAW;
D O I
10.1111/sjtg.12564
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
A rapidly expanding area of marine space in the Pacific is being assessed under a process known as Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). Through the political process, MSP brings together an assemblage of national governments, private organizations and local communities to define how marine spaces should be governed. MSP results in numerous new marine spatial categories that delimit an area according to the respective principals and rules decided upon. The authors of this article argue that traditional powers to make and enforce decisions concerning the governance of marine spaces have been weakened through the political process of MSP in the Pacific. The responses that emerged from conducting qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants in Fiji and the Cook Islands indicate that indigenous marine authority is being undermined through manipulation of the MSP process. The findings further revealed an underlying recognition that the MSP process has proven to be incapable of equitably weighing indigenous Pacific Islanders' interests in relation to the economic, environmental and security interests of external ocean stakeholders. The authors further argue that external ocean stakeholders can successfully pursue their own objectives through the MSP process in ways that bypass indigenous authority.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 580
页数:18
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Adams T., 1993, TRADITIONAL MARINE R, V2, P21
  • [2] Bambridge T, 2016, RAHUI: LEGAL PLURALISM IN POLYNESIAN TRADITIONAL MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES AND TERRITORIES, P1
  • [3] Bartholomew K., 2000, HDB RES METHODS PERS, P286
  • [4] The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation – a global reconnaissance
    Bavinck M.
    Berkes F.
    Charles A.
    Dias A.C.E.
    Doubleday N.
    Nayak P.
    Sowman M.
    [J]. Maritime Studies, 16 (1)
  • [5] Legal pluralism in aquatic regimes: a challenge for governance
    Bavinck, Maarten
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 11 : 78 - 85
  • [6] Changes in social orientation: Threats to a cultural institution in marine resource exploitation in Tonga
    Bender, Andrea
    [J]. HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 2007, 66 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [7] Navigating a just and inclusive path towards sustainable oceans
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 97 : 139 - 146
  • [8] An appeal for a code of conduct for marine conservation
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Teh, Lydia
    Ota, Yoshitaka
    Christie, Patrick
    Ayers, Adam
    Day, Jon C.
    Franks, Phil
    Gill, David
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Kittinger, John N.
    Koehn, J. Zachary
    Lewis, Naia.
    Parks, John
    Vierros, Marjo
    Whitty, Tara S.
    Wilhelm, Aulani
    Wright, Kim
    Aburto, Jaime A.
    Finkbeiner, Elena M.
    Gaymer, Carlos F.
    Govan, Hugh
    Gray, Noella
    Jarvis, Rebecca M.
    Kaplan-Hallam, Maery
    Satterfield, Terre
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2017, 81 : 411 - 418
  • [9] Ocean grabbing
    Bennett, Nathan James
    Govan, Hugh
    Satterfield, Terre
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2015, 57 : 61 - 68
  • [10] Bernard H.R., 2013, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches