Biomechanical characteristics of maxillary anterior incisor, conventional immediate implantation and socket shield technique - A finite element analysis and case report

被引:0
作者
Ye, Zhangyan [1 ]
Yu, Mingquan [2 ]
Ji, Yanwu [3 ]
Jia, Shengrui [2 ]
Xu, Xiaomin [2 ]
Yao, Huiyu [2 ]
Hua, Xiaowen [2 ]
Feng, Zhongqiang [1 ]
Shangguan, Guangwei [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Hou, Xuekun [4 ]
Ding, Xi [2 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Pingyang, Pingyang Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Wenzhou 325400, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Stomatol, Wenzhou 325015, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Wenzhou 325015, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Univ Chinese Med, Coll Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med, Shijiazhuang 050100, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Dental implants; Immediate implantation; Socket shield technology; Stress; Biomechanics; Finite element analysis; SINGLE-TOOTH EXTRACTION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; AESTHETIC OUTCOMES; BONE INTERFACE; PLACEMENT; ABUTMENT; POSTEXTRACTION; STABILITY; CONSENSUS; ZONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152313
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Background: To prevent the absorption and collapse of the labial bone plate of the anterior teeth, immediate implantation and socket shield technique have been increasingly applied to anterior dental aesthetic implant restoration. Objective: To provide a biomechanical basis for implant restoration of maxillary anterior teeth, finite element analysis was used to investigate the stress peak and distribution in different anatomical sites of natural teeth, conventional immediate implantation and socket shield technique. Methods: Three maxillary finite element models were established, including a maxillary incisor as a natural tooth, a conventional immediate implantation and a socket shield technique. A mechanical load of 100 N was applied to simulate and analyze the biomechanical behavior of the root, periodontal ligament (PDL), implant and surrounding bone interface. Results: The stress distribution of the natural tooth was relatively uniform under load. The maximum von Mises stress of the root, periodontal ligament, cortical bone and cancellous bone were 20.14 MPa, 2.473 MPa, 19.48 MPa and 5.068 MPa, respectively. When the conventional immediate implantation was loaded, the stress was mainly concentrated around the neck of implant. Maximum stress on the surface of the implant was 102 MPa, the cortical bone was 16.13 MPa, and the cancellous bone was 18.29 MPa. When the implantation with socket shield technique was loaded, the stress distribution of the implant was similar to that of immediate implantation. Maximum stress on the surface of the implant was 100.5 MPa, the cortical bone was 23.11 MPa, the cancellous bone was 21.66 MPa, the remaining tooth fragment was 29.42 MPa and the periodontal ligament of the tooth fragment was 1.131 MPa. Conclusions: 1. Under static loading, both socket shield technology and conventional immediate implantation can support the esthetic restoration of anterior teeth biomechanically. 2.Under short-term follow-up, both immediate implant and socket shield technology achieved satisfactory clinical results, including bone healing and patient satisfaction. 3.The stress distribution is mainly located on the buccal bone surface of the implant and is associated with resorption of the buccal bone plate after implant replacement in both socket shield technology and conventional immediate implantation. 4.The presence of retained root fragment had an impact on the bone graft gap. In immediate implantation, the peak stress was located in the cortical bone near the implant position, while in socket shield technology, the peak stress was at the neck of the cortical bone corresponding to the retained root fragment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial [J].
Abd-Elrahman, Ahmed ;
Shaheen, Mostafa ;
Askar, Niveen ;
Atef, Mohammed .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (05) :602-611
[2]   Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up [J].
Abdullah, Amr Hany ;
Gaber, Hala Kamal Abdel ;
Adel-Khattab, Doaa .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) :548-558
[3]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[4]   Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Atef, Mohamed ;
El Barbary, Ahmed ;
Dahrous, Mona Salah El-D ;
Zahran, Amr Fouad .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03) :456-465
[5]   The socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Atieh, Momen A. ;
Shah, Maanas ;
Abdulkareem, Mohammed ;
AlQahtani, Haif A. ;
Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M. .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 33 (08) :1186-1200
[6]   Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement - clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years [J].
Baeumer, Daniel ;
Zuhr, Otto ;
Rebele, Stephan ;
Huerzeler, Markus .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) :1450-1458
[7]   The Socket-Shield Technique: First Histological, Clinical, and Volumetrical Observations after Separation of the Buccal Tooth Segment - A Pilot Study [J].
Baeumer, Daniel ;
Zuhr, Otto ;
Rebele, Stephan ;
Schneider, David ;
Schupbach, Peter ;
Huerzeler, Markus .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (01) :71-82
[8]   Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load [J].
Bataineh, Khaled ;
Al Janaideh, Mohammad .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (06) :1206-1217
[9]   Postextraction Dental Implant in the Aesthetic Zone, Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Protocol [J].
Bramanti, Ennio ;
Norcia, Antonio ;
Cicciu, Marco ;
Matacena, Giada ;
Cervino, Gabriele ;
Troiano, Giuseppe ;
Zhurakivska, Khrystyna ;
Laino, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (04) :1037-1041
[10]   Influence of custom-made implant designs on the biomechanical performance for the case of immediate post-extraction placement in the maxillary esthetic zone: a finite element analysis [J].
Chen, Jianyu ;
Zhang, Zhiguang ;
Chen, Xianshuai ;
Zhang, Xiao .
COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 20 (06) :636-644