Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change

被引:0
|
作者
Agronin, Jacob [1 ]
Brown, Meredith [2 ]
Calvelli, Hannah [2 ]
Zhao, Huaqing [2 ]
Rakita, Val [3 ]
Toyoda, Yoshiya [4 ]
Abul Kashem, Mohammed [4 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Temple Heart & Vasc Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2024年 / 226卷
关键词
LVAD; heart transplant; UNOS; survival outcomes; MCSD; ECMO; heart failure; MORTALITY; NETWORK; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
tion score on October 18, 2018 to reflect the changing trends of candidates' mortality while awaiting transplant. We examined the impact of these policy changes on rates of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and outcomes after transplant from a relatively newer UNOS database. The UNOS registry was used to identify first-time adult heart recipients with LVAD at listing or transplant who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016 and March 10, 2020. Survival data were collected through March 30, 2023. Those listed before October 18, 2018 but transplanted after were excluded. Patients were divided into before or after change groups. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests. A p <0.05 was considered significant. We identified 4,387 heart recipients with LVAD in the before (n = 3,606) and after (n = 781) score change eras. The after group had a lower rate of LVAD implantation while listed than the before group (20.4% vs 34.9%, p <0.0001), and were more likely to be female (25.1% vs 20.2%, p = 0.002); in both groups, most recipients (62.8%) were white. There was significantly farther distance from the donor hospital to transplant center in the after group (264.4 NM vs 144.2 NM, p <0.0001) and decreased waitlist days (84.9 +/- 105.1 vs 369.2 +/- 459.5, p <0.0001). Recipients in the after group were more likely to use extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.7% vs 0.5%, p <0.0001) and intravenous inotropes (19.1% vs 7.5%, p <0.0001) and receive a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention increased risk donor organ (37.9% vs 30.5%, p <0.0001). Survival at 3 years was comparable between the 2 groups. The allocation score change in 2018 yielded considerable changes in mechanical circulatory support device implantation strategy and outcomes. The rate of LVAD implantation decreased with increased utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with acute kidney injury
    Silver, Samuel A.
    Long, Jin
    Zheng, Yuanchao
    Goldstone, Andrew B.
    Franz, Doug
    Chang, Tara I.
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 159 (02): : 477 - +
  • [32] Outcomes of Patients Referred for Cardiac Rehabilitation After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Shaaban, Adnan
    Schultz, Jessica
    Leonard, John
    Martin, Cindy M.
    Kamdar, Forum
    Alexy, Tamas
    Thenappan, Thenappan
    Pritzker, Marc
    Shaffer, Andrew
    John, Ranjit
    Cogswell, Rebecca
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2023, 69 (03) : 304 - 308
  • [33] Pre-implant left ventricular dimension is not associated with worse outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Srinivasan, Amudan J.
    Jamil, Mahbub
    Seese, Laura
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    Hickey, Gavin
    Keebler, Mary E.
    Mathier, Michael A.
    Kilic, Arman
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (09) : 5458 - 5466
  • [34] Relation Between Frailty and 1-Year Outcomes After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Uzun, Hakan Gokalp
    Simsek, Evrim
    Engin, Cagatay
    Yagdi, Tahir
    Karapolat, Hale
    Ozbaran, Mustafa
    Nalbantgil, Sanem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 173 : 88 - 93
  • [35] Outcomes After Concomitant Procedures with Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Implications by Device Type and Indication
    Maltais, Simon
    Haglund, Nicholas A.
    Davis, Mary E.
    Aaronson, Keith D.
    Pagani, Francis D.
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Stulak, John M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (04) : 403 - 409
  • [36] Outcomes of heart transplant recipients bridged with percutaneous versus durable left ventricular assist devices
    Xia, Yu
    Kim, Juka S. S.
    Eng, Isabel K. K.
    Nsair, Ali
    Ardehali, Abbas
    Shemin, Richard J. J.
    Kwon, Murray H. H.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (04)
  • [37] One-year outcomes with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Dogan, Guenes
    Zoch, Amelie
    Ricklefs, Marcel
    Wert, Leonhard
    Feldmann, Christina
    Bara, Christoph
    Shrestha, Malakh
    Tillmanns, Jochen
    Kempf, Tibor
    Bauersachs, Johann
    Haverich, Axel
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 156 (02): : 662 - 669
  • [38] Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Right Ventricular Strain in Women and Men Before and After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Kislitsina, Olga N.
    Rich, Jonathan D.
    Wilcox, Jane E.
    Vorovich, Esther E.
    Wu, Tingqing
    Churyla, Andrei
    Harap, Rebecca S.
    Andrei, Adin-Christian
    McCarthy, Patrick M.
    Yancy, Clyde W.
    Duc Thin Pham
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 17 (02) : 102 - 110
  • [39] Impact of Durable Ventricular Assist Device Support on Outcomes of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Waiting for Heart Transplant
    Cedars, Ari
    Tecson, Kristen M.
    Zaidi, Ali N.
    Lorts, Angela
    McCullough, Peter A.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (05) : 513 - 519
  • [40] Extracorporeal life support to left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplant - A strategy to optimize survival and resource utilization
    Pagani, FD
    Lynch, W
    Swaniker, F
    Dyke, DB
    Bartlett, R
    Koelling, T
    Moscucci, M
    Deeb, GM
    Bolling, S
    Monaghan, H
    Aaronson, KD
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (19) : 206 - 210