Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change

被引:0
|
作者
Agronin, Jacob [1 ]
Brown, Meredith [2 ]
Calvelli, Hannah [2 ]
Zhao, Huaqing [2 ]
Rakita, Val [3 ]
Toyoda, Yoshiya [4 ]
Abul Kashem, Mohammed [4 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Temple Heart & Vasc Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2024年 / 226卷
关键词
LVAD; heart transplant; UNOS; survival outcomes; MCSD; ECMO; heart failure; MORTALITY; NETWORK; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
tion score on October 18, 2018 to reflect the changing trends of candidates' mortality while awaiting transplant. We examined the impact of these policy changes on rates of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and outcomes after transplant from a relatively newer UNOS database. The UNOS registry was used to identify first-time adult heart recipients with LVAD at listing or transplant who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016 and March 10, 2020. Survival data were collected through March 30, 2023. Those listed before October 18, 2018 but transplanted after were excluded. Patients were divided into before or after change groups. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests. A p <0.05 was considered significant. We identified 4,387 heart recipients with LVAD in the before (n = 3,606) and after (n = 781) score change eras. The after group had a lower rate of LVAD implantation while listed than the before group (20.4% vs 34.9%, p <0.0001), and were more likely to be female (25.1% vs 20.2%, p = 0.002); in both groups, most recipients (62.8%) were white. There was significantly farther distance from the donor hospital to transplant center in the after group (264.4 NM vs 144.2 NM, p <0.0001) and decreased waitlist days (84.9 +/- 105.1 vs 369.2 +/- 459.5, p <0.0001). Recipients in the after group were more likely to use extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.7% vs 0.5%, p <0.0001) and intravenous inotropes (19.1% vs 7.5%, p <0.0001) and receive a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention increased risk donor organ (37.9% vs 30.5%, p <0.0001). Survival at 3 years was comparable between the 2 groups. The allocation score change in 2018 yielded considerable changes in mechanical circulatory support device implantation strategy and outcomes. The rate of LVAD implantation decreased with increased utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frailty and outcomes after implantation of left ventricular assist device as destination therapy
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Park, Soon J.
    Joyce, Lyle D.
    Daly, Richard C.
    Stulak, John M.
    McNallan, Sheila M.
    Roger, Veronique L.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : 359 - 365
  • [22] Survival and Functional Status After Bridge-to-Transplant with a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro
    Zhou, Xun
    Fraser, Charles D., III
    Grimm, Joshua C.
    Crawford, Todd C.
    Lui, Cecillia
    Valero, Vicente
    Choi, Chun W.
    Higgins, Robert S.
    Kilic, Ahmet
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (07) : 661 - 667
  • [23] Impact of Heart Transplant Allocation Change on Waitlist Mortality and Posttransplant Mortality in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Tibrewala, Anjan
    Chuzi, Sarah
    Wu, Tingqing
    Baldridge, Abigail S.
    Harap, Rebecca
    Bryner, Benjamin
    Pham, Duc Thinh
    Wilcox, Jane E.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2024, 17 (11)
  • [24] Racial disparities and outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to heart transplantation
    Okoh, Alexis Kofi
    Selevanny, Mariam
    Singh, Supreet
    Hirji, Sameer
    Singh, Swaiman
    Al Obaidi, Nawar
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Camacho, Margarita
    Russo, Mark J.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2020, 7 (05): : 2744 - 2751
  • [25] Sexual function in patients supported with left ventricular assist device and with heart transplant
    Hasin, Tal
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    Murninkas, Daniel
    Setareh-Shenas, Saman
    Yaari, Victoria
    Bar-Yosef, Simona
    Medalion, Benjamin
    Gerber, Yariv
    Ben-Gal, Tuvia
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2014, 1 (02): : 103 - 109
  • [26] Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infection on Post-transplant Outcomes
    Schulman, Allison R.
    Martens, Timothy P.
    Russo, Mark J.
    Christos, Paul J.
    Gordon, Rachel J.
    Lowy, Franklin D.
    Oz, Mehmet C.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 28 (03): : 237 - 242
  • [27] Heart Transplantation After Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Benefits, Risks, and Outcomes
    Pal, Nirvik
    Gay, Samuel H.
    Boland, Charles G.
    Lim, Aaron C.
    SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 24 (01) : 9 - 23
  • [28] New era for therapeutic strategy for heart failure: Destination therapy by left ventricular assist device
    Kyo, Shunei
    Minami, Taishi
    Nishimura, Takashi
    Gojo, Satoshi
    Ono, Minoru
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [29] Relationship of ventricular assist device support duration with pediatric heart transplant outcomes
    Butto, Arene
    Mao, Chad Y.
    Wright, Lydia
    Wetzel, Martha
    Kelleman, Michael S.
    Carboni, Michael P.
    Dipchand, Anne I.
    Knecht, Kenneth R.
    Reinhardt, Zdenka
    Sparks, Joshua D.
    Villa, Chet
    Mahle, William T.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (01): : 61 - 69
  • [30] Preoperative prealbumin does not impact outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Hong, Yeahwa
    Seese, Laura
    Hickey, Gavin
    Mathier, Michael
    Thoma, Floyd
    Kilic, Arman
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (05) : 1029 - 1036