Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change

被引:0
|
作者
Agronin, Jacob [1 ]
Brown, Meredith [2 ]
Calvelli, Hannah [2 ]
Zhao, Huaqing [2 ]
Rakita, Val [3 ]
Toyoda, Yoshiya [4 ]
Abul Kashem, Mohammed [4 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Temple Heart & Vasc Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2024年 / 226卷
关键词
LVAD; heart transplant; UNOS; survival outcomes; MCSD; ECMO; heart failure; MORTALITY; NETWORK; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
tion score on October 18, 2018 to reflect the changing trends of candidates' mortality while awaiting transplant. We examined the impact of these policy changes on rates of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and outcomes after transplant from a relatively newer UNOS database. The UNOS registry was used to identify first-time adult heart recipients with LVAD at listing or transplant who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016 and March 10, 2020. Survival data were collected through March 30, 2023. Those listed before October 18, 2018 but transplanted after were excluded. Patients were divided into before or after change groups. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests. A p <0.05 was considered significant. We identified 4,387 heart recipients with LVAD in the before (n = 3,606) and after (n = 781) score change eras. The after group had a lower rate of LVAD implantation while listed than the before group (20.4% vs 34.9%, p <0.0001), and were more likely to be female (25.1% vs 20.2%, p = 0.002); in both groups, most recipients (62.8%) were white. There was significantly farther distance from the donor hospital to transplant center in the after group (264.4 NM vs 144.2 NM, p <0.0001) and decreased waitlist days (84.9 +/- 105.1 vs 369.2 +/- 459.5, p <0.0001). Recipients in the after group were more likely to use extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.7% vs 0.5%, p <0.0001) and intravenous inotropes (19.1% vs 7.5%, p <0.0001) and receive a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention increased risk donor organ (37.9% vs 30.5%, p <0.0001). Survival at 3 years was comparable between the 2 groups. The allocation score change in 2018 yielded considerable changes in mechanical circulatory support device implantation strategy and outcomes. The rate of LVAD implantation decreased with increased utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes 5 Years From Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change
    Agronin, Jacob
    Brown, Meredith
    Rakita, Val
    Toyoda, Yoshiya
    Kashem, Mohammed
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [2] Impact of left ventricular assist device complications on heart transplant outcomes under the 2018 heart transplant allocation policy
    Siems, Chesney
    Cogswell, Rebecca
    Masotti, Maria
    Schultz, Jessica
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Shaffer, Andrew
    John, Ranjit
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (03):
  • [3] Sleeve Gastrectomy and Left Ventricular Assist Device for Heart Transplant
    Greene, Joseph
    Tran, Tung
    Shope, Timothy
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2017, 21 (03)
  • [4] Late sequelae of left ventricular assist device infection presenting after heart transplant
    Chiang, A. Dulanto
    Narsana, N.
    Ruiz, M. E.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 18 (03) : 453 - 456
  • [5] Renal Outcomes in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant With a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Jawitz, Oliver K.
    Fudim, Marat
    Raman, Vignesh
    Blumer, Vanessa
    Caliskan, Kadir
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Milano, Carmelo
    Soliman, Osama
    Rogers, Joseph
    Patel, Chetan B.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (02): : 567 - 574
  • [6] Characteristics and outcomes of left ventricular assist device recipients transplanted before and after the new donor heart allocation system
    Doulamis, Ilias P.
    Inampudi, Chakradhari
    Kourek, Christos
    Mandarada, Tejaswini
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Asleh, Rabea
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (12) : 2460 - 2468
  • [7] Right heart failure and "failure to thrive" after left ventricular assist device: Clinical predictors and outcomes
    Baumwol, Jay
    Macdonald, Peter S.
    Keogh, Anne M.
    Kotlyar, Eugene
    Spratt, Phillip
    Jansz, Paul
    Hayward, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (08): : 888 - 895
  • [8] Outcomes of Obese Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation with a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Okoh, Alexis K.
    Selevany, Mariam
    Heaton, Joseph
    Al-Obaidi, Nawar
    Vucicevic, Darko
    Tayal, Rajiv
    Zucker, Mark J.
    Camacho, Margarita
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Russo, Mark J.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2021, 67 (02) : 137 - 143
  • [9] Outcomes of heart transplant recipients with prior left ventricular assist device associated stroke
    Shoskes, Aaron
    Huang, Merry
    Hassett, Catherine
    Starling, Randall C.
    Hsich, Eileen
    Soltesz, Edward
    Cho, Sung-Min
    Uchino, Ken
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2023, 32 (08):
  • [10] Costs Before and After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant and Preceding Heart Transplant: A Cohort Study
    Prichard, Roslyn
    Kershaw, Louise
    Goodall, Stephen
    Davidson, Patricia
    Newton, Phillip J.
    Saing, Sopany
    Hayward, Christopher
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2020, 29 (09): : 1338 - 1346