The Group Intertemporal Decision-Making Process

被引:0
作者
Sun, Hong-Yue [1 ]
Xiao, Yi-Ting [1 ]
Yang, Shan-Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China
关键词
group intertemporal decision making; decision-making process; interpersonal interaction; information processing; RISK; CHOICE; PREFERENCES; UNCERTAINTY; BEHAVIOR; MODELS; TIME;
D O I
10.3390/bs14090815
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Intertemporal decision making is the process by which individuals make judgments or choices regarding outcomes that occur at different times. Although intertemporal decision making is widely investigated, most studies explore it in terms of individual decision making, while neglecting group decision making, which holds more practical significance and adaptive value. This study recommends adopting a "two-process" approach that uses self-assessment questionnaires, audiovisual recordings, and visual decision-making tools to quantify interpersonal interaction processes and information processing in group intertemporal decision-making settings. In this way, studies can reveal the psychological and theoretical mechanisms of the group intertemporal decision-making process. At the level of interpersonal interaction processes, such an approach can identify the differential mechanisms between group and individual intertemporal decision making. In terms of information processing, it can reveal the mechanisms of the decision-making process in group intertemporal decision making. The findings of such work can provide a basis for interventions and nudges that encourage more visionary group intertemporal decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other [J].
Albrecht, Konstanze ;
Volz, Kirsten G. ;
Sutter, Matthias ;
Laibson, David I. ;
von Cramon, D. Yves .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 6 (02) :218-225
[2]   Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk [J].
Batteux, Eleonore ;
Ferguson, Eamonn ;
Tunney, Richard J. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05)
[3]   The effects of variability and expectations on utilization of member expertise and group performance [J].
Baumann, MR ;
Bonner, BL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2004, 93 (02) :89-101
[4]   DISCOUNT RATES INFERRED FROM DECISIONS - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
BENZION, U ;
RAPOPORT, A ;
YAGIL, J .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (03) :270-284
[5]  
Bi P.C., 2010, Bus. Manag. J., V32, P80
[6]   Delay discounting in dyads and small groups: Group leadership, status information, and actor-partner interdependence [J].
Bixter, Michael T. ;
Luhmann, Christian C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 86
[7]   Age-related differences in delay discounting: Immediate reward, reward magnitude, and social influence [J].
Bixter, Michael T. ;
Rogers, Wendy A. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 32 (04) :471-484
[8]   Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making [J].
Bixter, Michael T. ;
Trimber, Elizabeth M. ;
Luhmann, Christian C. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2017, 45 (05) :837-851
[9]   Cuing both positive and negative episodic foresight reduces delay discounting but does not affect risk-taking [J].
Bulley, Adam ;
Miloyan, Beyon ;
Pepper, Gillian V. ;
Gullo, Matthew J. ;
Henry, Julie D. ;
Suddendorf, Thomas .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (08) :1998-2017
[10]  
[池丽萍 Chi Liping], 2020, [心理科学进展, Advances in Psychological Science], V28, P41, DOI 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2020.00041