The Role of the Advocate in Administrative Decision-Making

被引:0
作者
Higgins, R. C. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Banco Chambers Sydney, Sydney, Australia
[2] Australian Acad Law, Sydney, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | 2024年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Oral advocacy has long occupied a central place in common law adjudication. Most of the discussion of that tradition occurs in the context of court proceedings, but advocacy is equally vital to decision-making outside the courts. This article explains how and when oral advocacy can provide benefits to administrative decision-making, particularly merits review. The article also examines how those benefits are sought to be fostered within the framework of the Administrative Review Tribunal Bill 2023 (Cth). The article concludes that many of the purposes of the proposed Administrative Review Tribunal will be furthered, and will sometimes demand, an oral hearing.
引用
收藏
页数:46
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Osborn v Parole Board
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Goldberg v. Kelly
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SSHD v AF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, 12 H GIBBS MEM OR 32
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Sengupta v Holmes
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Administrative Review Reform: Issues Paper, P58
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[10]  
Heydon Dyson, 2008, Rediscovering Rhetoric, P235