Numerical algorithms for generating an almost even approximation of the Pareto front in nonlinear multi-objective optimization problems

被引:1
作者
Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam [1 ]
Khorram, Esmaile [1 ]
Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid [2 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, 424 Hafez Ave, Tehran 15914, Iran
[2] Bu Ali Sina Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Hamadan, Iran
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-objective optimization problem; Pareto optimal solution; Pareto front; Pascoletti-Serafini scalarization approach; Hyperplane; NORMAL-BOUNDARY INTERSECTION; NORMAL CONSTRAINT METHOD; WEIGHTED-SUM METHOD; SCALARIZATION; POINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) returns a set of non-dominated points, the so-called Pareto front. Since this set is usually infinite, it is impossible to generate it completely in practice. Therefore, a discrete approximation of the Pareto front is created. One of the most important features of this approximation is a uniform distribution of points on the full Pareto front in order to present a wide variety of solutions to the decision maker who chooses a final solution. While a few algorithms consider this property, two algorithms based on the Pascoletti-Serafini (PS) scalarization approach are proposed. In addition, six well-known test problems with convex and non-convex Pareto fronts are considered to show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Their results are compared with some algorithms including Normal Constraint (NC), Benson type, Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II), S-Metric Selection Evolutionary Multiobjective Algorithm (SMS-EMOA), Differential Evolution (DE) with Binomial Crossover and MOEA/D-DE. The computational results on CPU time and reasonable distribution of points obtained on the Pareto front show that the presented algorithms perform better than other algorithms on these criteria. In addition, although the proposed algorithms compete closely with some algorithms in terms of CPU time, they have more non-dominated solutions and more appropriate distribution than they do in most problems.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, P 3 WORLD C STRUCT M
[2]   Multiobjective GAs, quantitative indices, and pattern classification [J].
Bandyopadhyay, S ;
Pal, SK ;
Aruna, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2004, 34 (05) :2088-2099
[3]   A New Scalarization Technique to Approximate Pareto Fronts of Problems with Disconnected Feasible Sets [J].
Burachik, R. S. ;
Kaya, C. Y. ;
Rizvi, M. M. .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, 162 (02) :428-446
[4]   Distributed fixed-time nonlinear control of microgrids based on event-triggered strategy [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Xiang, Hongbing .
NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2023, 111 (21) :19931-19946
[5]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[6]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69
[7]  
Deb K, 2004, ADV INFO KNOW PROC, P105
[8]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[9]   Centroidal Voronoi tessellations: Applications and algorithms [J].
Du, Q ;
Faber, V ;
Gunzburger, M .
SIAM REVIEW, 1999, 41 (04) :637-676
[10]   A new scalarization and numerical method for constructing the weak Pareto front of multi-objective optimization problems [J].
Dutta, Joydeep ;
Kaya, C. Yalcin .
OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 60 (8-9) :1091-1104