Development and Efficacy of an Ethical Decision-Making Tool for Training Clinical Psychologists

被引:0
|
作者
Hunt, Melissa G. [1 ]
Nagaswami, Megha [1 ]
Park, Suh Jung [1 ]
Bishop, Nicholas [1 ]
Zoupou, Eirini [1 ]
Shi, Catherine [1 ]
Suh, Lily [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Boga, Cathryn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, 425 South Univ Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
ethics; ethical dilemma; decision making; evidence based; training; CODE; SUPERVISION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/tep0000467
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
We developed an ethical decision-making tool to assist in training clinical psychologists that had four goals: (a) to mirror the way psychologists naturally think about ethical dilemmas; (b) to facilitate thorough analysis by using a simple, guided checklist format; (c) to provide quick access to intuitively organized explanations and examples of each major domain of ethical challenges and principles; and (d) to facilitate good documentation and record-keeping of the decision-making process. Study 1 surveyed clinical psychologists and asked them to list the top 10-15 ethical considerations they encounter in practice, and then used those categories to help develop the tool. In Study 2, having access to two different versions of the tool significantly improved the quality of analysis of a standardized clinical vignette, particularly for individuals still in training. In Study 3, a streamlined version of the tool significantly improved the quality of graduate trainees' analysis of the standardized clinical vignette and was faster to use. In Study 4, we demonstrated the efficacy of the tool in helping trainees analyze ethical dilemmas they had actually experienced. In Study 5, faculty at doctoral programs who teach graduate ethics courses provided dilemmas and then graded the responses of trainees who analyzed them either with or without the tool. Analyses completed with the tool received far better grades on average than those completed without the tool. This work is the first that we know of to develop an evidence-based, empirically supported tool for training future psychologists in ethical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 296
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Review on Ethical Decision-Making Technology for Unmanned Ground Vehicle
    Luan, Tian
    Qu, Xinyi
    Li, Xueyuan
    Liu, Qi
    Wang, Yiping
    Li, Zirui
    2022 34TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC, 2022, : 4407 - 4414
  • [42] Calculation, principle or bias? Information preference and ethical decision-making
    Bento, Regina
    Mertins, Lasse
    White, Lourdes F.
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 50 (03) : 232 - 252
  • [43] Dynamic Policy Evaluation for Ethical Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicles
    Detjen-Leal, Daniel
    Quijano, Nicanor
    Francisco Rodriguez, Carlos
    2023 IEEE 6TH COLOMBIAN CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, CCAC, 2023, : 136 - 141
  • [44] Ethical Decision-Making Differences Between American and Moroccan Managers
    Oumlil, A. Ben
    Balloun, Joseph L.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 84 (04) : 457 - 478
  • [45] Head nurses' decision-making when managing ethical dilemmas
    Zydziunaite, Vilma
    Lepaite, Daiva
    Astedt-Kurki, Paivi
    Suominen, Tarja
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 10 (02) : 166 - 187
  • [46] Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach
    Schwartz, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 139 (04) : 755 - 776
  • [47] Caregivers' Use of Spirituality in Ethical Decision-Making
    Koenig, Terry L.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2005, 45 (1-2): : 155 - 172
  • [48] Consumer recycling: An ethical decision-making process
    Culiberg, Barbara
    Bajde, Domen
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 12 (06) : 449 - 459
  • [49] Ethical decision-making levels of oncology nurses
    Baysal, Ebru
    Sari, Dilek
    Erdem, Hatice
    NURSING ETHICS, 2019, 26 (7-8) : 2204 - 2212
  • [50] Ethical decision-making: the doctrine of sin and grace
    Giles, S. P.
    IN DIE SKRIFLIG-IN LUCE VERBI, 2009, 43 (02): : 341 - 359