Development and Efficacy of an Ethical Decision-Making Tool for Training Clinical Psychologists

被引:0
|
作者
Hunt, Melissa G. [1 ]
Nagaswami, Megha [1 ]
Park, Suh Jung [1 ]
Bishop, Nicholas [1 ]
Zoupou, Eirini [1 ]
Shi, Catherine [1 ]
Suh, Lily [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Boga, Cathryn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, 425 South Univ Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
ethics; ethical dilemma; decision making; evidence based; training; CODE; SUPERVISION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/tep0000467
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
We developed an ethical decision-making tool to assist in training clinical psychologists that had four goals: (a) to mirror the way psychologists naturally think about ethical dilemmas; (b) to facilitate thorough analysis by using a simple, guided checklist format; (c) to provide quick access to intuitively organized explanations and examples of each major domain of ethical challenges and principles; and (d) to facilitate good documentation and record-keeping of the decision-making process. Study 1 surveyed clinical psychologists and asked them to list the top 10-15 ethical considerations they encounter in practice, and then used those categories to help develop the tool. In Study 2, having access to two different versions of the tool significantly improved the quality of analysis of a standardized clinical vignette, particularly for individuals still in training. In Study 3, a streamlined version of the tool significantly improved the quality of graduate trainees' analysis of the standardized clinical vignette and was faster to use. In Study 4, we demonstrated the efficacy of the tool in helping trainees analyze ethical dilemmas they had actually experienced. In Study 5, faculty at doctoral programs who teach graduate ethics courses provided dilemmas and then graded the responses of trainees who analyzed them either with or without the tool. Analyses completed with the tool received far better grades on average than those completed without the tool. This work is the first that we know of to develop an evidence-based, empirically supported tool for training future psychologists in ethical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 296
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis
    Ersdal, Gerhard
    Aven, Terie
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (02) : 197 - 205
  • [22] Ethical decision-making regarding infant viability: A discussion
    Kelly, Janet
    Welch, Emma
    NURSING ETHICS, 2018, 25 (07) : 897 - 905
  • [23] The Effect of Groupwork on Ethical Decision-Making of Accountancy Students
    Conor O’Leary
    Gladies Pangemanan
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, 75 : 215 - 228
  • [24] The effect of groupwork on ethical decision-making of accountancy students
    O'Leary, Conor
    Pangemanan, Gladies
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 75 (03) : 215 - 228
  • [25] Coding Ethical Decision-Making in Research
    Hartmann, David J.
    Van Valey, Thomas
    Fuqua, Wayne
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 121 - 146
  • [26] Understanding ethical decision-making in design
    Corple, Danielle J.
    Zoltowski, Carla B.
    Kenny Feister, Megan
    Buzzanell, Patrice M.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2020, 109 (02) : 262 - 280
  • [27] The palliative approach and ethical decision-making
    Ceccaldi, J.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2008, 10 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [28] Autonomous Agents and Ethical Decision-Making
    Cervantes, Jose-Antonio
    Rodriguez, Luis-Felipe
    Lopez, Sonia
    Ramos, Felix
    Robles, Francisco
    COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2016, 8 (02) : 278 - 296
  • [29] Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed, Mike
    Wilkinson, Tim
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [30] A tool for the consensual analysis of decision-making scenarios
    Hunt, Geoffrey
    Merzeder, Christine
    Bischofberger, Iren
    NURSING ETHICS, 2018, 25 (03) : 359 - 375