Development and Efficacy of an Ethical Decision-Making Tool for Training Clinical Psychologists

被引:0
|
作者
Hunt, Melissa G. [1 ]
Nagaswami, Megha [1 ]
Park, Suh Jung [1 ]
Bishop, Nicholas [1 ]
Zoupou, Eirini [1 ]
Shi, Catherine [1 ]
Suh, Lily [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Boga, Cathryn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, 425 South Univ Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
ethics; ethical dilemma; decision making; evidence based; training; CODE; SUPERVISION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/tep0000467
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
We developed an ethical decision-making tool to assist in training clinical psychologists that had four goals: (a) to mirror the way psychologists naturally think about ethical dilemmas; (b) to facilitate thorough analysis by using a simple, guided checklist format; (c) to provide quick access to intuitively organized explanations and examples of each major domain of ethical challenges and principles; and (d) to facilitate good documentation and record-keeping of the decision-making process. Study 1 surveyed clinical psychologists and asked them to list the top 10-15 ethical considerations they encounter in practice, and then used those categories to help develop the tool. In Study 2, having access to two different versions of the tool significantly improved the quality of analysis of a standardized clinical vignette, particularly for individuals still in training. In Study 3, a streamlined version of the tool significantly improved the quality of graduate trainees' analysis of the standardized clinical vignette and was faster to use. In Study 4, we demonstrated the efficacy of the tool in helping trainees analyze ethical dilemmas they had actually experienced. In Study 5, faculty at doctoral programs who teach graduate ethics courses provided dilemmas and then graded the responses of trainees who analyzed them either with or without the tool. Analyses completed with the tool received far better grades on average than those completed without the tool. This work is the first that we know of to develop an evidence-based, empirically supported tool for training future psychologists in ethical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 296
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does use of a decision-making model improve the quality of school psychologists' ethical decisions?
    Boccio, Dana E.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2021, 31 (02) : 119 - 135
  • [2] ETHICAL REASONING AND DECISION-MAKING IN THE CLINICAL SETTING - ASSESSING THE PROCESS
    MYSER, C
    KERRIDGE, IH
    MITCHELL, KR
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1995, 29 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [3] Ethical Issues in Decision-Making for Infants with Disorders of Sex Development
    Kon, A. A.
    HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 2015, 47 (05) : 340 - 343
  • [4] ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING IN TURKISH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY
    Oztepe, Misra Cigeroglu
    Kulac, Onur
    VOPROSY GOSUDARSTVENNOGO I MUNITSIPALNOGO UPRAVLENIYA-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES, 2019, (05): : 62 - 78
  • [5] Ethical Decision-Making in the "Crowded Classroom"
    Geron, Tatiana
    HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2023, 93 (03) : 342 - 365
  • [6] Ethical decision-making of supervisors of color
    Levitt, Dana Heller
    Crawford, Candice R.
    Pamphile, Shanta
    JOURNAL OF MULTICULTURAL COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 50 (02) : 59 - 72
  • [7] A practical approach to ethical decision-making
    Maddalena, Victor
    LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2007, 20 (02) : 71 - 75
  • [9] Embodied Ethical Decision-Making: A Clinical Case Study of Respect for Culturally Based Meaning Making in Mental Healthcare
    Roberts, Megz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DANCE THERAPY, 2021, 43 (01) : 36 - 63
  • [10] TOOL FOR DECISION-MAKING SUPPORT IN BIOREFINERIES DEVELOPMENT
    Gonzalez-Herrera, I. Y.
    Rabasa-Olazabal, G.
    Perez-Martinez, A.
    Gonzalez-Suarez, E.
    Castro-Galiano, E.
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE INGENIERIA QUIMICA, 2016, 15 (03): : 943 - 951