Construction and comprehensive evaluation of an index system for climate-smart agricultural development in China

被引:1
作者
Tong, Haotian [1 ]
Xia, Enjun [1 ]
Sun, Cong [1 ]
Yan, Kuan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jun
Huang, Jieping [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management, Zhongguancun South St 5, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Climate-smart agriculture; Food security; Adaptation; Emission mitigation; Integrated index; GPCA-EWM; ECONOMIC-IMPACTS; ADAPTATION; TEMPERATURE; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143216
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change and extreme weather threaten food security and farmers' livelihoods in several regions, and are increasingly affecting production. Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) approaches, which attempt to strike a balance between food security, climate change resilience, and agricultural carbon emissions, have achieved significant results in many parts of the world but are still in urgent need of replication in China. In this study, we developed a protector-victim-perpetrator (PVP) analytical framework to analyse the complex links between climate change and agricultural production for the first time and constructed the first climate-smart agriculture development index (CSADI) in China through a modified GPCA-EWM methodology. The evaluation results showed that the CSA development level in most provinces and regions in China continuously improved from 2010 to 2020 but that the overall level was still low, with only four provinces and regions reaching a highly distinct level. The development level of climate-smart agriculture in China was constrained by the insufficient adaptation of agriculture to climate change, the overreliance of most regions on the innate advantages brought about by resource endowment, and the lack of acquired management and protection. Food security was often negatively correlated with agricultural carbon emissions, but the potential for reducing carbon emissions was quite limited, with ecological degradation and livestock overload in Tibet being of particular concern. In summary, mitigating agricultural carbon emissions by improving adaptability, drawing a bottom line for natural resource protection, popularising climate-smart agricultural technologies, and cross-regional integrated ecological management will help enhance the development of climate-smart agriculture in China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Assessing Climate Smart Agriculture and Its Determinants of Practice in Ghana: A Case of the Cocoa Production System
    Akrofi-Atitianti, Felix
    Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
    Bockel, Louis
    Asare, Richard
    [J]. LAND, 2018, 7 (01)
  • [2] Income and yield effects of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) adoption in flood prone areas of Bangladesh: Farm level evidence
    Akter, Asma
    Geng, Xianhui
    Mwalupaso, Gershom Endelani
    Lu, Hua
    Hoque, Fazlul
    Ndungu, Michael Kiraru
    Abbas, Qasir
    [J]. CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 37
  • [3] Effect of climate smart agriculture technologies on crop yields: Evidence from potato production in Kenya
    Andati, P.
    Majiwa, E.
    Ngigi, M.
    Mbeche, R.
    Ateka, J.
    [J]. CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2023, 41
  • [4] Climate Smart Agriculture? Assessing the Adaptation Implications in Zambia
    Arslan, Aslihan
    McCarthy, Nancy
    Lipper, Leslie
    Asfaw, Solomon
    Cattaneo, Andrea
    Kokwe, Misael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (03) : 753 - 780
  • [5] Hot spots of wheat yield decline with rising temperatures
    Asseng, Senthold
    Cammarano, Davide
    Basso, Bruno
    Chung, Uran
    Alderman, Phillip D.
    Sonder, Kai
    Reynolds, Matthew
    Lobell, David B.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2017, 23 (06) : 2464 - 2472
  • [6] Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate-smart agriculture practices: A meta-analysis
    Bai, Xiongxiong
    Huang, Yawen
    Ren, Wei
    Coyne, Mark
    Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre
    Tao, Bo
    Hui, Dafeng
    Yang, Jian
    Matocha, Chris
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (08) : 2591 - 2606
  • [7] Does climate-smart agriculture improve household income and food security? Evidence from Southern Ethiopia
    Belay, Abrham
    Mirzabaev, Alisher
    Recha, John W.
    Oludhe, Christopher
    Osano, Philip M.
    Berhane, Zerihun
    Olaka, Lydia A.
    Tegegne, Yitagesu T.
    Demissie, Teferi
    Mutsami, Chrispinus
    Solomon, Dawit
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (07) : 16711 - 16738
  • [8] Impact of co-product selection on techno-economic analyses of alternative jet fuel produced with forest harvest residuals
    Brandt, Kristin L.
    Wooley, Robert J.
    Geleynse, Scott C.
    Gao, Johnway
    Zhu, Junyong
    Cavalieri, Ralph P.
    Wolcott, Michael P.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2020, 14 (04): : 764 - 775
  • [9] Agriculture intensification reduces plant taxonomic and functional diversity across European arable systems
    Carmona, Carlos P.
    Guerrero, Irene
    Peco, Begona
    Morales, Manuel B.
    Onate, Juan J.
    Part, Tomas
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Liira, Jaan
    Aavik, Tsipe
    Emmerson, Mark C.
    Berendse, Frank
    Ceryngier, Piotr
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Weisser, Wolfgang W.
    Bengtsson, Jan
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 34 (07) : 1448 - 1460
  • [10] Identifying the Economic Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture
    Carter, Colin
    Cui, Xiaomeng
    Ghanem, Dalia
    Merel, Pierre
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 10, 2018, 10 : 361 - 380