Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

被引:48
|
作者
Ozen, Gulsen [1 ]
Pedro, Sofia [2 ]
England, Bryant R. [3 ,4 ]
Mehta, Bella [5 ]
Wolfe, Frederick [2 ]
Michaud, Kaleb [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, 986270 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] The Natl Databank Rheumat Dis, FORWARD, Wichita, KS USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[4] VA Nebraska Western Iowa Hlth Care Syst, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Hosp Special Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
NECROSIS-FACTOR THERAPY; ANTI-TNF; DOUBLE-BLIND; BACTERIAL-INFECTIONS; RITUXIMAB; METHOTREXATE; AGENTS; HOSPITALIZATION; MALIGNANCIES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/acr2.11064
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the risk of serious infections (SIs) associated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsWe studied patients with RA who initiated bDMARDs or csDMARDs from 2001 to 2016 in FORWARD-The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were categorized into three groups: (1) csDMARDs (bDMARD-na & iuml;ve; reference), (2) tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFis), and (3) non-TNFi biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and anakinra). SIs were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization or those resulting in death. We calculated the propensity score (PS), which reflected the probability of receiving a specific DMARD group, and estimated the hazard ratio (HR) (with the 95% confidence interval [CI]) for SI from multivariable Cox models, adjusting for PS and time-varying confounders.ResultsA total of 694 (5.9%) first SIs were identified in 11 623 patients with RA during 27 552 patient-years of follow-up. The SI incidence rate per 1000 patient-years was 22.4 (95% CI 19.2-26.1) for csDMARDs, 26.9 (95% CI 24.5-29.6) for TNFis, and 23.3 (95% CI 19.0-28.5) for non-TNFi bDMARDs. Adjusted HRs for SIs were 1.33 (95% CI 1.05-1.68) for TNFis and 1.48 (95% CI 1.02-2.16) for non-TNFi bDMARDs, compared with csDMARDs. The SI risk with non-TNFi bDMARDs versus TNFis was not different. Other risk factors for SI were older age, higher comorbidity burden (particularly pulmonary disease), higher weighted cumulative prednisone dose, disability and disease activity, and number of prior csDMARD failures.ConclusionTNFis and non-TNFi bDMARDs were associated with an increased SI risk compared with csDMARDs in RA, even after accounting for risk-associated patient characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 432
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors Associated with the Initiation of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Texas Medicaid Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Kim, Gilwan
    Barner, Jamie C.
    Rascati, Karen
    Richards, Kristin
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (05): : 401 - 407
  • [42] Adherence of rheumatoid arthritis patients to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional study
    Mena-Vazquez, Natalia
    Manrique-Arija, Sara
    Yunquera-Romero, Lucia
    Urena-Garnica, Inmaculada
    Rojas-Gimenez, Marta
    Domic, Carla
    Gabriel Jimenez-Nunez, Francisco
    Fernandez-Nebro, Antonio
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (10) : 1709 - 1718
  • [43] Switching and Discontinuation Pattern of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Tofacitinib for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan
    Li, Ko-Jen
    Chang, Chia-Li
    Hsin, Chih-Yi
    Tang, Chao-Hsiun
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [44] JAK Inhibitors Versus Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Which Is More Effective for Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain?
    Weiland, Abigail
    Lee, Yvonne C.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024,
  • [45] Prevalence of Anemia Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
    Kay, Jonathan
    Rancourt, Joshua
    Bradley, John D.
    Arora, Vipin K.
    Zhong, Jinglin
    Dickson, Christina
    Muram, David
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [46] Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Kivitz, Alan
    Olech, Ewa
    Borofsky, Michael
    Zazueta, Beatriz M.
    Navarro-Sarabia, Federico
    Radominski, Sebastiao C.
    Merrill, Joan T.
    Rowell, Lucy
    Nasmyth-Miller, Clare
    Bao, Min
    Wright, Stephen
    Pope, Janet E.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (11) : 1653 - 1661
  • [47] The Risk of Cardiovascular Events Associated With Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Ozen, Gulsen
    Pedro, Sofia
    Michaud, Kaleb
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (05) : 648 - 655
  • [48] Inclusion of glucocorticoids in recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Saag et al Reply
    Saag, Kenneth G.
    Furst, Daniel E.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2009, 61 (01): : 142 - 142
  • [49] The 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Where the rubber meets the road
    Bathon, Joan M.
    Cohen, Stanley B.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (06): : 757 - 759
  • [50] Risk of Venous Thromboembolism and Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Kim, Seoyoung C.
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    Liu, Jun
    Glynn, Robert J.
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 19 - 19