Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

被引:48
|
作者
Ozen, Gulsen [1 ]
Pedro, Sofia [2 ]
England, Bryant R. [3 ,4 ]
Mehta, Bella [5 ]
Wolfe, Frederick [2 ]
Michaud, Kaleb [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, 986270 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] The Natl Databank Rheumat Dis, FORWARD, Wichita, KS USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[4] VA Nebraska Western Iowa Hlth Care Syst, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Hosp Special Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
NECROSIS-FACTOR THERAPY; ANTI-TNF; DOUBLE-BLIND; BACTERIAL-INFECTIONS; RITUXIMAB; METHOTREXATE; AGENTS; HOSPITALIZATION; MALIGNANCIES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/acr2.11064
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the risk of serious infections (SIs) associated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsWe studied patients with RA who initiated bDMARDs or csDMARDs from 2001 to 2016 in FORWARD-The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were categorized into three groups: (1) csDMARDs (bDMARD-na & iuml;ve; reference), (2) tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFis), and (3) non-TNFi biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and anakinra). SIs were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization or those resulting in death. We calculated the propensity score (PS), which reflected the probability of receiving a specific DMARD group, and estimated the hazard ratio (HR) (with the 95% confidence interval [CI]) for SI from multivariable Cox models, adjusting for PS and time-varying confounders.ResultsA total of 694 (5.9%) first SIs were identified in 11 623 patients with RA during 27 552 patient-years of follow-up. The SI incidence rate per 1000 patient-years was 22.4 (95% CI 19.2-26.1) for csDMARDs, 26.9 (95% CI 24.5-29.6) for TNFis, and 23.3 (95% CI 19.0-28.5) for non-TNFi bDMARDs. Adjusted HRs for SIs were 1.33 (95% CI 1.05-1.68) for TNFis and 1.48 (95% CI 1.02-2.16) for non-TNFi bDMARDs, compared with csDMARDs. The SI risk with non-TNFi bDMARDs versus TNFis was not different. Other risk factors for SI were older age, higher comorbidity burden (particularly pulmonary disease), higher weighted cumulative prednisone dose, disability and disease activity, and number of prior csDMARD failures.ConclusionTNFis and non-TNFi bDMARDs were associated with an increased SI risk compared with csDMARDs in RA, even after accounting for risk-associated patient characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 432
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib, Biologic Drugs and Traditional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Machado, Marina
    Moura, Cristiano
    Behlouli, Hassan
    Curtis, Jeffrey
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06) : 937 - 938
  • [32] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOFACITINIB, BIOLOGIC DRUGS AND TRADITIONAL DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Moura, C. S.
    Machado, M. A.
    Behlouli, H.
    Curtis, J. R.
    Abrahamowicz, M.
    Bernatsky, S.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 825 - 826
  • [33] Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib, Biologic Drugs and Traditional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Machado, Marina
    Moura, Cristiano S.
    Behlouli, Hassan
    Curtis, Jeffiey R.
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [34] Survival of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Rosales Rosado, Zulema
    Leon, Leticia
    Freites Nunez, Dalifer
    Font Urgelles, Judit
    Leon Cardenas, Cynthia Milagros
    Vadillo Font, Cristina
    Rodriguez Rodriguez, Luis
    Jover Jover, Juan A.
    Abasolo Alcazar, Lydia
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [35] Inclusion of glucocorticoids in recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Saag et al
    van Tuyl, L. H. D.
    Lems, W. F.
    Voskuyl, A. E.
    Dijkmans, B. A. C.
    Boers, M.
    Kerstens, P. J. S. M.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2009, 61 (01): : 141 - 142
  • [36] Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Initiating Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
    Kim, Seoyoung C.
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    Liu, Jun
    Franklin, Jessica M.
    Glynn, Robert J.
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 128 (05): : 539.e7 - 539.e17
  • [37] Treatment failure with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients
    Mittal, Niti
    Mittal, Rakesh
    Sharma, Aman
    Jose, Vinu
    Wanchu, Ajay
    Singh, Surjit
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (08) : 532 - 536
  • [38] Benefits of Methotrexate Use on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
    Xie, Fenglong
    Chen, Lang
    Yun, Huifeng
    Levitan, Emily B.
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (06) : 804 - 812
  • [39] Adherence of rheumatoid arthritis patients to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional study
    Natalia Mena-Vazquez
    Sara Manrique-Arija
    Lucía Yunquera-Romero
    Inmaculada Ureña-Garnica
    Marta Rojas-Gimenez
    Carla Domic
    Francisco Gabriel Jimenez-Nuñez
    Antonio Fernandez-Nebro
    Rheumatology International, 2017, 37 : 1709 - 1718
  • [40] BIOLOGIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS PRESCRIPTION OVER TIME IN A COHORT OF EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS
    Fedele, A. L.
    Melpignano, F.
    Bruno, D.
    La Ferrara, R.
    D'agostino, M. A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 603 - 603