Analysis of Key Factors for Evaluating Mucosal Adhesion Using Swine Buccal Tissue

被引:1
作者
Pestana, Aylla Mesquita [1 ]
Calixto, Giovana Maria Fioramonti [1 ]
Bezerra, Arthur Antunes Costa [1 ]
Ribeiro, Ligia Nunes de Morais [2 ]
da Costa, Aline Carvalho [3 ]
Moraes, Angela Maria [4 ]
Franz-Montan, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Biosci, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Inst Biotechnol, Bionanotechnol Lab Prof Luiz Ricardo Goulart Filho, Inst Biotechnol, BR-38400902 Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Chem Engn, Dept Proc & Prod Dev, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Chem Engn, Dept Engn Mat & Bioproc, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Buccal delivery; Mucosal delivery; Mucosal drug delivery; Mucoadhesive; Factorial design; Texture analyzer; Topical formulation; Composite design; DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEMS; TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE 0.1-PERCENT; RECURRENT APHTHOUS STOMATITIS; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; IN-VITRO; MUCOADHESIVE PROPERTIES; POLYMERIC SYSTEMS; POLOXAMER; 407; ORAL-MUCOSA; PERMEABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.xphs.2024.04.018
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The assessment of the mucoadhesive properties peak mucoadhesive force (Fmax) max ) and work of mucoadhesion (Wmuc) muc ) with texture analyzers is a common in vitro method for analyzing formulation capabilities. Challenges arise in selecting and standardizing experimental conditions due to various variables influencing mucoadhesion. This complexity hampers direct product performance comparisons. In our study, we explored factors (contact force and time, probe speed and mucin in artificial saliva) impacting a model formulation's mucoadhesive capacity. Using Omcilon-A degrees Orabase degrees Orabase on porcine buccal mucosa, we systematically varied experimental conditions, employing a statistical approach (Central Composite Design- CCD). Three variables (contact force, contact time, probe speed) and their interactions were assessed for their impact on F max and W muc . Results showed that contact time and force positively affected F max , while only contact time influenced W muc . In the mucin artificial saliva test, a force of 0.5 N, time of 600 s, and speed of 1 mm/s yielded optimal F max (0.587 N) and W muc (0.468 N.s). These conditions serve as a reference for comparing mucoadhesive properties of formulations for topical oral use. (c) 2024 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2413 / 2419
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Mucoadhesion and Mechanical Assessment of Oral Films
    Alaei, Samaneh
    Omidian, Hamid
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 159
  • [2] Bilayer Mucoadhesive Buccal Film for Mucosal Ulcers Treatment: Development, Characterization, and Single Study Case
    Alves, Thais F. R.
    Rios, Alesssandra C.
    Pontes, Katiusca da Silva
    Portella, Decio L.
    Aranha, Norberto
    Severino, Patricia
    Souto, Eliana B.
    Gonsalves, Joyce K. M.
    Nunes, Rogeria de Souza
    Chaud, Marco, V
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICS, 2020, 12 (07) : 1 - 24
  • [3] Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery
    Andrews, Gavin P.
    Laverty, Thomas P.
    Jones, David S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2009, 71 (03) : 505 - 518
  • [4] Mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal drug delivery: In vitro-in vivo correlation study
    Baus, Randi Angela
    Zahir-Jouzdani, Forouhe
    Duennhaupt, Sarah
    Atyabi, Fatemeh
    Bernkop-Schnuerch, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2019, 142 : 498 - 505
  • [5] Peptide KSL-W-Loaded Mucoadhesive Liquid Crystalline Vehicle as an Alternative Treatment for Multispecies Oral Biofilm
    Bernegossi, Jessica
    Fioramonti Calixto, Giovana Maria
    da Silva Sanches, Paulo Ricardo
    Fontana, Carla Raquel
    Cilli, Eduardo Maffud
    Garrido, Saulo Santesso
    Chorilli, Marlus
    [J]. MOLECULES, 2016, 21 (01)
  • [6] Bernkop-Schnurch Andreas, 2005, Drug Discov Today Technol, V2, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.001
  • [7] Bhattacharya S., 2021, Response Surface Methodology in Engineering Science, DOI [DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.95835, 10.5772/intechopen.95835]
  • [8] BROWNE RM, 1968, LANCET, V1, P565
  • [9] Effect of Freezing and Type of Mucosa on Ex Vivo Drug Permeability Parameters
    Caon, Thiago
    Oliveira Simoes, Claudia Maria
    [J]. AAPS PHARMSCITECH, 2011, 12 (02): : 587 - 592
  • [10] Nanotechnology-based Polymeric Bio(muco)Adhesive Platforms for Controlling Drug Delivery - properties, Methodologies and Applications
    Carvalho, Flavia Chiva
    Chorilli, Marius
    Daflon Gremiao, Maria Palmira
    [J]. POLIMEROS-CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA, 2014, 24 (02): : 203 - 213