The relational nature of citizen science

被引:1
|
作者
Moon, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Yates, Sophie [3 ]
Callaghan, Corey T. [4 ]
Thompson, Maureen [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Business, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Florida, Ft Lauderdale Res & Educ Ctr, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Davie, FL USA
[5] Australian Museum Res Inst, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
agential realism; frogs; human-nature relationship; interdisciplinary research; nature connectedness; public engagement in science; social science methods; thematic analysis; PARTICIPANTS; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10709
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Most citizen science research inherently separates the observer (citizen science participant) from the observation (e.g. data point), placing artificial boundaries around what matters and how it comes to matter. We apply three elements of the philosophical framework of agential realism to reveal a more complex picture of how data arise within citizen science programmes, and its meaning to both the practice of science and the citizen science participant: 'intra-action' (all entities have agency and are entangled with one another); 'material becoming' (what comes to matter); and 'responsibility' (accountability for what comes to matter and what is excluded from mattering). We draw on a case study of FrogID-an Australia-wide citizen science program focused on calling frogs, with over 42,000 participants and over 1 million frog records. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 FrogID users, completing two rounds of thematic and relational coding. Our findings reveal that as a consequence of their recording behaviours, FrogID participants become increasingly entangled with the nocturnal environment, with sound and with their own self. Expanding and reciprocal relationships and experiences shape the nature and frequency of their recordings. Second, meaning influences what comes to matter (i.e. what is recorded and submitted) for FrogID participants. We reveal meaning related to feedback (recognition and thus reciprocity), others (social networks and participation with family and friends) and the self (physical and mental well-being and identity formation/becoming). These different forms of meaning influenced engagement with app use. Third, participants communicated responsibilities related to their involvement in citizen science, including responsibilities to create knowledge (e.g. longitudinal data collection), to conserve (e.g. actively conserving frog, formally committing areas to conservation) and to educate self and others (e.g. skills and competencies required for environmental action). Synthesis and applications: By recognizing a more comprehensive set of intra-actions, beyond the observer and the observation, agential realism can reveal when, why and how citizen science observations are made; what observations come to matter and why; and how people can create a more just world. Agential realism can shape how citizen science participation, retention and biodiversity data generation are founded. We propose three opportunities for citizen science programs based on these findings.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2076
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screens, streams, and flows: Implications of digital platforms for aquatic citizen science
    Millar, Edward
    Melles, Stephanie
    Rinner, Claus
    GEOFORUM, 2023, 146
  • [42] Exploring scientists? perceptions of citizen science for public engagement with science
    Collins, Stephanie A.
    Sullivan, Miriam
    Bray, Heather J.
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2022, 21 (07):
  • [43] The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support
    Newman, Greg
    Graham, Jim
    Crall, Alycia
    Laituri, Melinda
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 6 (3-4) : 217 - 227
  • [44] The potential of citizen science to transform science: Lessons for a sustainable future
    Austen, K.
    Janssen, A.
    Wittmayer, J. M.
    Hoelker, F.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (02) : 435 - 445
  • [45] Technological Affordance and the Realities of Citizen Science Projects Developed in Challenging Territories
    Grigoletto, Fabio
    de Oliveira, Fernanda Antunes
    Momesso, Caio Caradi
    Nehemy, Ibrahim Kamel Rodrigues
    de Almeida Junior, Joao Emilio
    Sao Pedro, Vinicius de Avelar
    Greco, Roberto
    Alves, Mario Aquino
    Edwards, Tim
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [46] Participating in Rural Appraisal? A Review of Participatory GIS and Citizen Science Approaches
    Ntassiou, Konstantina
    GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2025, 19 (03):
  • [47] Authentic science with citizen science and student-driven science fair projects
    Koomen, Michele Hollingsworth
    Rodriguez, Elizabeth
    Hoffman, Alissa
    Petersen, Cindy
    Oberhauser, Karen
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, 102 (03) : 593 - 644
  • [48] Spanish Science Teacher Educators' Preparation, Experiences, and Views About Nature of Science in Science Education
    Garcia-Carmona, Antonio
    SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2022, 31 (03) : 685 - 711
  • [49] A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations
    West, Simon
    Haider, L. Jamila
    Stalhammar, Sanna
    Woroniecki, Stephen
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2020, 16 (01) : 304 - 325
  • [50] Ethical Concerns in Citizen Science Projects and Public Engagement Related Research Projects
    Tauginiene, Loreta
    ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 26 (01) : 119 - 134