The relational nature of citizen science

被引:1
|
作者
Moon, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Yates, Sophie [3 ]
Callaghan, Corey T. [4 ]
Thompson, Maureen [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Business, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Florida, Ft Lauderdale Res & Educ Ctr, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Davie, FL USA
[5] Australian Museum Res Inst, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
agential realism; frogs; human-nature relationship; interdisciplinary research; nature connectedness; public engagement in science; social science methods; thematic analysis; PARTICIPANTS; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10709
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Most citizen science research inherently separates the observer (citizen science participant) from the observation (e.g. data point), placing artificial boundaries around what matters and how it comes to matter. We apply three elements of the philosophical framework of agential realism to reveal a more complex picture of how data arise within citizen science programmes, and its meaning to both the practice of science and the citizen science participant: 'intra-action' (all entities have agency and are entangled with one another); 'material becoming' (what comes to matter); and 'responsibility' (accountability for what comes to matter and what is excluded from mattering). We draw on a case study of FrogID-an Australia-wide citizen science program focused on calling frogs, with over 42,000 participants and over 1 million frog records. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 FrogID users, completing two rounds of thematic and relational coding. Our findings reveal that as a consequence of their recording behaviours, FrogID participants become increasingly entangled with the nocturnal environment, with sound and with their own self. Expanding and reciprocal relationships and experiences shape the nature and frequency of their recordings. Second, meaning influences what comes to matter (i.e. what is recorded and submitted) for FrogID participants. We reveal meaning related to feedback (recognition and thus reciprocity), others (social networks and participation with family and friends) and the self (physical and mental well-being and identity formation/becoming). These different forms of meaning influenced engagement with app use. Third, participants communicated responsibilities related to their involvement in citizen science, including responsibilities to create knowledge (e.g. longitudinal data collection), to conserve (e.g. actively conserving frog, formally committing areas to conservation) and to educate self and others (e.g. skills and competencies required for environmental action). Synthesis and applications: By recognizing a more comprehensive set of intra-actions, beyond the observer and the observation, agential realism can reveal when, why and how citizen science observations are made; what observations come to matter and why; and how people can create a more just world. Agential realism can shape how citizen science participation, retention and biodiversity data generation are founded. We propose three opportunities for citizen science programs based on these findings.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2076
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intelligent Recommendations for Citizen Science
    Ben Zaken, Daniel
    Gal, Kobi
    Shani, Guy
    Segal, Avi
    Cavalier, Darlene
    THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 14693 - 14701
  • [22] Citizen Science for public health
    Den Broeder, Lea
    Devilee, Jeroen
    Van Oers, Hans
    Schuit, A. Jantine
    Wagemakers, Annemarie
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 33 (03) : 505 - 514
  • [23] The role of citizen science in management of invasive avian species: What people think, know, and do
    Phillips, Tina B.
    Bailey, Robyn L.
    Martin, Vicki
    Faulkner-Grant, Holly
    Bonter, David N.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 280
  • [24] Brokering Trust in Citizen Science
    Gilfedder, Mat
    Robinson, Cathy J.
    Watson, James E. M.
    Campbell, Thomas G.
    Sullivan, Brian L.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 32 (03) : 292 - 302
  • [25] Interrupting pathways to health inequities in citizen science health research
    Pierce, Robin L.
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (SUPPL 2) : 21 - 34
  • [26] Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?
    Bonney, Rick
    Phillips, Tina B.
    Ballard, Heidi L.
    Enck, Jody W.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [27] Modes and Existences in Citizen Science: Thoughts from Earthquake Country
    Mazel-Cabasse, Charlotte
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, 2019, 32 (02): : 34 - 51
  • [28] Facebook groups as citizen science tools for plant species monitoring
    Marceno, Corrado
    Padulles Cubino, Josep
    Chytry, Milan
    Genduso, Emanuele
    Salemi, Dario
    La Rosa, Alfonso
    Gristina, Alessandro Silvestre
    Agrillo, Emiliano
    Bonari, Gianmaria
    Giusso del Galdo, Gianpietro
    Ilardi, Vincenzo
    Landucci, Flavia
    Guarino, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (10) : 2018 - 2028
  • [29] Nature of Science or Nature of the Sciences?
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Psillos, Dimitris
    Stamou, George
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2016, 100 (04) : 706 - 733
  • [30] Making citizen science count: Best practices and challenges of citizen science projects on plastics in aquatic environments
    Rambonnet, Liselotte
    Vink, Suzanne C.
    Land-Zandstra, Anne M.
    Bosker, Thijs
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2019, 145 : 271 - 277