Evaluation of External Costs Change Due to High Speed Rail in Italy

被引:0
作者
Farsi, Martina [1 ]
Tartaglia, Mario [1 ]
Vannacci, Lorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ferrovie Stato Italiane, FS Res Ctr, Florence, Italy
来源
SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEMS, IW-HSR 2023 | 2024年
关键词
High speed rail; External costs; Handbook on the external costs of transport; Italy; Milan-Rome;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-53684-7_1
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The evaluation of the external costs of transport has become increasingly relevant and fundamental, as much as the growing interest and concern about climate change; even if these costs involve aspects beyond environmental ones, like accidents and congestion, they allow the environmental impacts of people's transport choices to be determined and represented, transforming them in monetary costs. The EU Commission has been debating these topics for almost 20 years, and DG Move has covered this topic in the Handbook on the External Costs of Transport; moreover, during this period (2022-2024), the European Commission has been organising a fitness check to prepare a recommendation on how to better implement the polluter pays principle, which could balance the costs perceived by the polluters and those borne by the community. In this context, railways can play a key role in reducing the impact of Transport. It is well-known that train transport is one of the least impactful modes of transport, as showed by several studies, like that conducted by UIC "Greening Transport" (Domergue & Markovic-Chenais, Greening transport-Reduce external costs, 2012); it could be improved by new technologies, but it is already less impactful than air and road transport. The problem is encouraging its use by passengers and freight carriers. For instance, users of the roads don't perceive all of the effects and the relative costs that they produce: for them, travel by car remains the most convenient mode in terms of money, comfort, and (perhaps even) time. Only major events, like an economic crisis or a pandemic, can change people's mobility habits, and this change will not always favour less impactful modes of travel, as we saw during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some governments have sought to resolve this through modal choice: France, for example, has sought to reduce its environmental impacts (namely CO2 emissions) by banning air connections where comparable train services exist, and take less than two and a half hours to cover the OD distance. Despite the foregoing, and even if modal choices in Italy haven't changed much over the past few decades, some Italian Origin/Destination pairings witnessed major changes in people's modal choices following the development of High Speed Rail. Based on this modal shift, this paper aims to analyse the change in the External Impacts of Transport for passengers on certain HSR OD pairings in Italy. The comparison is performed between the external costs of transport with or without the High Speed Rail services. The analysis is carried out considering the modal share surveys and pax-km for the specific OD pairing selected for the years 2008 and 2019. The external costs evaluation follows the methodology explained in the Handbook on the External Costs of Transport by DG MOVE (EC [European Commission] et al., Handbook on the external costs of transport-Version 2019-1.1, 2020).
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 25
页数:23
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Angeli Franco, 1999, I costi ambientali e sociali della mobilita in Italia-Secondo rapporto di sintesi
[2]  
Angeli Franco, 2001, I costi ambientali e sociali della mobilita in Italia-Quarto rapporto
[3]  
Angeli Franco, 1998, I costi ambientali e sociali della mobilita in Italia
[4]  
Angeli Franco, 2005, I costi ambientali e sociali della mobilita in Italia-Quinto rapporto
[5]  
Barron I., 2012, Economic analysis of high speed rail in Europe
[6]  
Danielis R., 2001, Rassegna critica delle stime dei costi esterni dei trasporti
[7]  
Domergue P., 2012, Greening transportReduce external costs
[8]  
ESSEN H., 2020, Handbook on the external costs of transport-Version 2019-1.1, DOI [10.2832/51388, DOI 10.2832/51388]
[9]  
EU Member States, 2008, Official Journal, V115, P0132
[10]  
Eurocontrol, 2021, Think Paper #11