Effect of SagittalRoot Position, Angle, and Bone Thickness on Peri-implant Tissue Phenotype and Bone Level in Socket Shield Technique: A Retrospective Case Series

被引:1
作者
Gurbuz, Ezgi [1 ]
Ceylan, Ezgi [1 ]
Ersoz, Mehmet Meric [1 ]
Keceli, Huseyin Gencay [1 ]
机构
[1] Kutahya Hlth Sci Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, Kutahya, Turkiye
关键词
bone; bone thickness; dental implant; phenotype; sagittal root angle; sagittal root position; socket shield technique; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT; TOOTH EXTRACTION; AESTHETIC ZONE; SOFT-TISSUE; PLACEMENT; PRESERVATION; DIMENSIONS; CONTOUR;
D O I
10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00104
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
There were only a few studies investigating the effect of sagittal root position (SRP), sagittal root angle (SRA), and buccal bone thickness (BBT) on peri-implant tissues using the socket shield technique (SST). This retrospective case series aimed to evaluate the SRP, SRA, and BBT in socket shield cases and examine the effect of these anatomical factors on the peri-implant tissue phenotype and bone level. Data from 27 patients (14 women, 13 men) treated with SST in the maxillary esthetic region between July 2019 and September 2021 were included. Clinical indices (modified plaque and bleeding indices, probing depth, keratinized mucosa width, mucosal thickness) and periapical radiographic recordings (marginal bone level) taken immediately after permanent prosthesis placement and 1 year later were used. Cone beam computerized tomography images were used to examine BBT, SRP, and SRA before implant placement and horizontal and vertical bone levels before implant placement and 1 year after prosthetic rehabilitation. The data were divided into groups based on BBT (<1 and >= 1 mm) and SRA values (<10 degrees and >= 10 degrees). There were no significant differences in 1-year clinical factors between the SRA <10 degrees and SRA >= 10 degrees groups. However, higher vertical bone loss was found in the SRA >= 10 degrees group (P = .01, d = 0.53). There were no significant differences in clinical or radiographic factors between the BBT <1 mm and BBT >= 1 mm groups. In conclusion, BBT showed no significant effect on tissue phenotype and bone level, but SRA affected bone level in socket shield cases.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 316
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial [J].
Abd-Elrahman, Ahmed ;
Shaheen, Mostafa ;
Askar, Niveen ;
Atef, Mohammed .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (05) :602-611
[2]   Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up [J].
Abdullah, Amr Hany ;
Gaber, Hala Kamal Abdel ;
Adel-Khattab, Doaa .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) :548-558
[3]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[4]  
Arun Kumar G, 2013, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V13, P466, DOI 10.1007/s13191-012-0242-6
[5]   Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Atef, Mohamed ;
El Barbary, Ahmed ;
Dahrous, Mona Salah El-D ;
Zahran, Amr Fouad .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03) :456-465
[6]   Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development [J].
Atieh, Momen A. ;
Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M. ;
Payne, Alan G. T. ;
Duncan, Warwick ;
Faggion, Clovis M. ;
Esposito, Marco .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (05)
[7]   Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement - clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years [J].
Baeumer, Daniel ;
Zuhr, Otto ;
Rebele, Stephan ;
Huerzeler, Markus .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) :1450-1458
[8]   Postextraction Dental Implant in the Aesthetic Zone, Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Protocol [J].
Bramanti, Ennio ;
Norcia, Antonio ;
Cicciu, Marco ;
Matacena, Giada ;
Cervino, Gabriele ;
Troiano, Giuseppe ;
Zhurakivska, Khrystyna ;
Laino, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (04) :1037-1041
[9]  
Braut V, 2011, INT J PERIODONT REST, V31, P125
[10]   Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements:: a 1-year prospective clinical study [J].
Cardaropoli, G ;
Lekholm, U ;
Wennström, JL .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (02) :165-171