共 43 条
Association Between Dyadic Coping and Psychosocial Adjustment and the Mediation Effect of Fear of Disease Progression in Patients With Malignancy and Their Caregivers: Based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model
被引:0
|作者:
Ma, Hualong
[1
]
He, Yongyue
[4
]
Wu, Weixin
[3
]
Ye, Qiuyun
[2
]
Wu, Qinyang
[1
]
Hu, Ke
[1
]
Jiang, Xiaohao
[4
]
Tang, Lu
[4
]
Yang, Qiaohong
[1
]
机构:
[1] Jinan Univ, Sch Nursing, Room 528, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Tianhe Shipai Huashi Community, Hlth Serv Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] St Marks Sch, Southborough, MA USA
[4] Shanwei Second Peoples Hosp, Shanwei, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model;
APIM;
APIMeM;
Cancer;
Dyadic coping;
Fear of disease progression;
Psychological adjustment;
Risk factors;
Structure equation model;
FAMILY CAREGIVERS;
CANCER-PATIENTS;
BREAST-CANCER;
COUPLES;
BURDEN;
INTERVENTIONS;
VALIDATION;
STRESSORS;
D O I:
10.1097/NCC.0000000000001395
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Psychosocial adjustment (PSA) in patients exhibits a positive correlation with dyadic coping (DC) and a negative correlation with fear of disease progression (FoP). However, few studies have explored how DC impacts PSA and whether FoP mediates this relationship. Objective: To investigate the status of DC, FoP, and PSA in patients with malignancy and their caregivers and to explore the actor-partner and mediating effect of FoP on the association between PSA and DC. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design with convenience sampling to select patients with malignancy and their caregivers from 2 hospitals in China. SPSS and AMOS were used for data analysis. Results: The model showed the mediation effect accounts for 28.30% of the total effect. For the actor effects, patients' and their caregivers' DC influenced their PSA directly (both beta = -.138, P < .05) or through their FoP (beta = -.050 and beta = -.55, both P < .05). As for partner effects, patients' DC influenced the caregivers' PSA directly or through the patients' FoP (beta = -.118 and beta = -.020, both P < .05). Caregivers' DC also influenced patients' PSA directly (beta = -.118, P < .05) or through the patients' or caregivers' FoP (beta = -.098 and beta = -.018, both P < .05). Conclusions: The model revealed a significant mediating effect of FoP on the association between the PSA and DC of patients with malignancy and their caregivers. Implications for practiceNurses should adopt a comprehensive perspective that includes caregivers in holistic care to improve their PSA by improving their level of DC or mitigating FoP.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文