Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccines:Systematic Literature Reviewof Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Yiting [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Shuaixin [3 ]
Zhao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wang, Haode [4 ]
Jiang, Hongbo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 283 Jianghai Rd, Guangzhou 510310, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Basic Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Outpatient Dept Baogang, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, England
[5] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
来源
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
systematic review; discrete choice experiment; preference; COVID-19; vaccine; VACCINATION; VACCINES; PROGRAMS; DELIVERY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/56546
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccination can be viewed as comprising the most important defensive barriers to protect susceptible groupsfrom infection. However, vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 is widespread worldwide.Objective: We aimed to systematically review studies eliciting the COVID-19 vaccine preference using discrete choiceexperiments.Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus platforms inApril 2023. Search terms included discrete choice experiments, COVID-19, and vaccinesand related synonyms. Descriptivestatistics were used to summarize the study characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed by factors such as high-incomecountries and low- and middle-income countries and study period (before, during, and after the pandemic wave). Quality appraisalwas performed using the 5-item Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, and Significance checklist.Results: The search yield a total of 623 records, and 47 studies with 53 data points were finally included. Attributes weregrouped into 4 categories: outcome, process, cost, and others. The vaccine effectiveness (21/53, 40%) and safety (7/53, 13%)were the most frequently reported and important attributes. Subgroup analyses showed that vaccine effectiveness was the mostimportant attribute, although the preference varied by subgroups. Compared to high-income countries (3/29, 10%), a higherproportion of low- and middle-income countries (4/24, 17%) prioritized safety. As the pandemic progressed, the duration ofprotection (2/24, 8%) during the pandemic wave and COVID-19 mortality risk (5/25, 20%) after the pandemic wave emerged as2 of the most important attributes.Conclusions: Our review revealed the critical role of vaccine effectiveness and safety in COVID-19 vaccine preference. However,it should be noticed that preference heterogeneity was observed across subpopulations and may change over time
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples’ preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
    Galina Williams
    Irina Kinchin
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2023, 24 : 987 - 998
  • [32] Applications of discrete choice experiments in COVID-19 research: Disparity in survey qualities between health and transport fields
    Haghani, Milad
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    De Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2022, 44
  • [33] Endocrine system after 2 years of COVID-19 vaccines: A narrative review of the literature
    Pezzaioli, Letizia Chiara
    Gatta, Elisa
    Bambini, Francesca
    Facondo, Paolo
    Gava, Maria
    Cavadini, Maria
    Buoso, Caterina
    Di Lodovico, Elena
    Rotondi, Mario
    Ferlin, Alberto
    Cappelli, Carlo
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Bell's Palsy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Albakri, Khaled
    Khaity, Abdulrhman
    Atwan, Hany
    Saleh, Othman
    Al-Hajali, Momen
    Cadri, Shirin
    Diab, Rehab Adel
    Albazee, Ebraheem
    Negida, Ahmed
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [35] The Effect of Smoking on Humoral Response to COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies
    Ferrara, Pietro
    Gianfredi, Vincenza
    Tomaselli, Venera
    Polosa, Riccardo
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [36] The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review
    Williams, Galina
    Kinchin, Irina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2023, 24 (06) : 987 - 998
  • [37] COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients with Maintenance Hemodialysis
    Yen, Cheng-Chieh
    Lin, Shang-Yi
    Chen, Szu-Chia
    Chiu, Yi-Wen
    Chang, Jer-Ming
    Hwang, Shang-Jyh
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [38] Unraveling Cardiovascular Risks and Benefits of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review
    Satyam, Shakta Mani
    El-Tanani, Mohamed
    Bairy, Laxminarayana Kurady
    Rehman, Abdul
    Srivastava, Ananya
    Kenneth, Jewel Mary
    Prem, Sereena Maria
    CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2025, 25 (02) : 306 - 323
  • [39] Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines in Adults with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
    van den Berg, Jesse M.
    Remmelzwaal, Sharon
    Blom, Marieke T.
    Hoek, Beryl A. C. E.
    Swart, Karin M. A.
    Overbeek, Jetty A.
    Burchell, George L.
    Herings, Ron M. C.
    Elders, Petra J. M.
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [40] Public Preferences for Exit Strategies From COVID-19 Lockdown in Germany-A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Krauth, Christian
    Oedingen, Carina
    Bartling, Tim
    Dreier, Maren
    Spura, Anke
    de Bock, Freia
    von Rueden, Ursula
    Betsch, Cornelia
    Korn, Lars
    Robra, Bernt-Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 66 : 591027