Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccines:Systematic Literature Reviewof Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Yiting [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Shuaixin [3 ]
Zhao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wang, Haode [4 ]
Jiang, Hongbo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 283 Jianghai Rd, Guangzhou 510310, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Basic Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Outpatient Dept Baogang, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, England
[5] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
来源
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
systematic review; discrete choice experiment; preference; COVID-19; vaccine; VACCINATION; VACCINES; PROGRAMS; DELIVERY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/56546
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccination can be viewed as comprising the most important defensive barriers to protect susceptible groupsfrom infection. However, vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 is widespread worldwide.Objective: We aimed to systematically review studies eliciting the COVID-19 vaccine preference using discrete choiceexperiments.Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus platforms inApril 2023. Search terms included discrete choice experiments, COVID-19, and vaccinesand related synonyms. Descriptivestatistics were used to summarize the study characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed by factors such as high-incomecountries and low- and middle-income countries and study period (before, during, and after the pandemic wave). Quality appraisalwas performed using the 5-item Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, and Significance checklist.Results: The search yield a total of 623 records, and 47 studies with 53 data points were finally included. Attributes weregrouped into 4 categories: outcome, process, cost, and others. The vaccine effectiveness (21/53, 40%) and safety (7/53, 13%)were the most frequently reported and important attributes. Subgroup analyses showed that vaccine effectiveness was the mostimportant attribute, although the preference varied by subgroups. Compared to high-income countries (3/29, 10%), a higherproportion of low- and middle-income countries (4/24, 17%) prioritized safety. As the pandemic progressed, the duration ofprotection (2/24, 8%) during the pandemic wave and COVID-19 mortality risk (5/25, 20%) after the pandemic wave emerged as2 of the most important attributes.Conclusions: Our review revealed the critical role of vaccine effectiveness and safety in COVID-19 vaccine preference. However,it should be noticed that preference heterogeneity was observed across subpopulations and may change over time
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiovascular Disease and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Published Cases
    Khaity, Abdulrhman
    Rababah, Ala' Abdala Mohamad
    Abdelwahab, Omar A.
    Albakri, Khaled
    Diab, Rehab Adel
    Al-dardery, Nada Mostafa
    Abbassy, Mahmoud
    Al-Hanaqtah, Balqees M.
    Awad, Ahmed K.
    Mohamad, Tamam
    EUROPEAN CARDIOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 18
  • [22] Safety and Adverse Events Related to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines; a Systematic Review
    SeyedAlinaghi, SeyedAhmad
    Karimi, Amirali
    Pashaei, Zahra
    Afzalian, Arian
    Mirzapour, Pegah
    Ghorbanzadeh, Kobra
    Ghasemzadeh, Afsaneh
    Dashti, Mohsen
    Nazarian, Newsha
    Vahedi, Farzin
    Tantuovir, Marcarious M.
    Shamsabadi, Ahmadreza
    Dadras, Omid
    Mehraeen, Esmaeil
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [23] COVID-19 Vaccines during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review
    Novillo, Blanca
    Martinez-Varea, Alicia
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [24] Complications of COVID-19 Vaccines during Pregnancy; a Systematic Review
    SeyedAlinaghi, SeyedAhmad
    MohsseniPour, Mehrzad
    Saeidi, Solmaz
    Habibi, Pedram
    Dashti, Mohsen
    Nazarian, Newsha
    Noori, Tayebeh
    Pashaei, Zahra
    Bagheri, AmirBehzad
    Ghasemzadeh, Afsaneh
    Afsahi, Amir Masoud
    Aghaie, Narjes
    Mojdeganlou, Paniz
    Arjmand, Ghazal
    Zargari, Ghazal
    Modiri, Roshanak
    Mojdeganlou, Hengameh
    Razi, Armin
    Mehraeen, Esmaeil
    Dadras, Omid
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [25] Public Preferences for Policies to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands
    Mouter, Niek
    Boxebeld, Sander
    Kessels, Roselinde
    van Wijhe, Maarten
    de Wit, Ardine
    Lambooij, Mattijs
    van Exel, Job
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (08) : 1290 - 1297
  • [26] Students' preferences for returning to colleges and universities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discrete choice experiment
    Steimle, Lauren N.
    Sun, Yuming
    Johnson, Lauren
    Besedes, Tibor
    Mokhtarian, Patricia
    Nazzal, Dima
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2022, 82
  • [27] Preferences for COVID-19 epidemic control measures among French adults: a discrete choice experiment
    Jonathan Sicsic
    Serge Blondel
    Sandra Chyderiotis
    François Langot
    Judith E. Mueller
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2023, 24 : 81 - 98
  • [28] Preferences for COVID-19 epidemic control measures among French adults: a discrete choice experiment
    Sicsic, Jonathan
    Blondel, Serge
    Chyderiotis, Sandra
    Langot, Francois
    Mueller, Judith E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2023, 24 (01) : 81 - 98
  • [29] Preference of young adults for COVID-19 vaccination in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment
    Boger, Sophie
    van Bergen, Ilja
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Cheung, Kei Long
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (08) : 921 - 931
  • [30] Public Preferences for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program in Quebec: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Morillon, Gabin F.
    Poder, Thomas G.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (03) : 341 - 354