Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccines:Systematic Literature Reviewof Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:3
作者
Huang, Yiting [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Shuaixin [3 ]
Zhao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wang, Haode [4 ]
Jiang, Hongbo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 283 Jianghai Rd, Guangzhou 510310, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Basic Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Outpatient Dept Baogang, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, England
[5] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
来源
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
systematic review; discrete choice experiment; preference; COVID-19; vaccine; VACCINATION; VACCINES; PROGRAMS; DELIVERY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/56546
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccination can be viewed as comprising the most important defensive barriers to protect susceptible groupsfrom infection. However, vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 is widespread worldwide.Objective: We aimed to systematically review studies eliciting the COVID-19 vaccine preference using discrete choiceexperiments.Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus platforms inApril 2023. Search terms included discrete choice experiments, COVID-19, and vaccinesand related synonyms. Descriptivestatistics were used to summarize the study characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed by factors such as high-incomecountries and low- and middle-income countries and study period (before, during, and after the pandemic wave). Quality appraisalwas performed using the 5-item Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, and Significance checklist.Results: The search yield a total of 623 records, and 47 studies with 53 data points were finally included. Attributes weregrouped into 4 categories: outcome, process, cost, and others. The vaccine effectiveness (21/53, 40%) and safety (7/53, 13%)were the most frequently reported and important attributes. Subgroup analyses showed that vaccine effectiveness was the mostimportant attribute, although the preference varied by subgroups. Compared to high-income countries (3/29, 10%), a higherproportion of low- and middle-income countries (4/24, 17%) prioritized safety. As the pandemic progressed, the duration ofprotection (2/24, 8%) during the pandemic wave and COVID-19 mortality risk (5/25, 20%) after the pandemic wave emerged as2 of the most important attributes.Conclusions: Our review revealed the critical role of vaccine effectiveness and safety in COVID-19 vaccine preference. However,it should be noticed that preference heterogeneity was observed across subpopulations and may change over time
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 92 条
[71]   Understanding Patients' Preferences: A Systematic Review of Psychological Instruments Used in Patients' Preference and Decision Studies [J].
Russo, Selena ;
Jongerius, Chiara ;
Faccio, Flavia ;
Pizzoli, Silvia F. M. ;
Pinto, Cathy Anne ;
Veldwijk, Jorien ;
Janssens, Rosanne ;
Simons, Gwenda ;
Falahee, Marie ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther ;
Huys, Isabelle ;
Postmus, Douwe ;
Kihlbom, Ulrik ;
Pravettoni, Gabriella .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (04) :491-501
[72]   The radically unequal distribution of Covid-19 vaccinations: a predictable yet avoidable symptom of the fundamental causes of inequality [J].
Rydland, Havard Thorsen ;
Friedman, Joseph ;
Stringhini, Silvia ;
Link, Bruce G. ;
Eikemo, Terje Andreas .
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 9 (01)
[73]   Patient Preferences for Psoriasis Treatments Process Characteristics Can Outweigh Outcome Attributes [J].
Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa ;
Schmieder, Astrid ;
Umar, Nasir ;
Terris, Darcey ;
Goebeler, Matthias ;
Goerdt, Sergj ;
Peitsch, Wiebke K. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 147 (11) :1285-1294
[74]   COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics [J].
Schwarzinger, Michael ;
Watson, Verity ;
Arwidson, Pierre ;
Alla, Francois ;
Luchini, Stephane .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 6 (04) :E210-E221
[75]   Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine fatigue [J].
Stamm, Tanja A. ;
Partheymueller, Julia ;
Mosor, Erika ;
Ritschl, Valentin ;
Kritzinger, Sylvia ;
Alunno, Alessia ;
Eberl, Jakob-Moritz .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (05) :1164-+
[76]   How should COVID-19 vaccines be distributed between the Global North and South: a discrete choice experiment in six European countries [J].
Steinert, Janina, I ;
Sternberg, Henrike ;
Veltri, Giuseppe A. ;
Buthe, Tim .
ELIFE, 2022, 11
[77]   Malaysian public preferences and decision making for COVID-19 vaccination: A discrete choice experiment [J].
Teh, Hoon Shien ;
Woon, Yuan Liang ;
Leong, Chin Tho ;
Hing, Nicholas Yee Liang ;
Mien, Teresa Yong Sui ;
Roope, Laurence S. J. ;
Clarke, Philip M. ;
Lim, Lee -Ling ;
Buckell, John .
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2022, 27
[78]   Preference and Willingness to Pay for the Regular COVID-19 Booster Shot in the Vietnamese Population: Theory-Driven Discrete Choice Experiment [J].
Tran, Bach Xuan ;
Do, Anh Linh ;
Boyer, Laurent ;
Auquier, Pascal ;
Le, Huong Thi ;
Vu, Minh Ngoc Le ;
Dang, Trang Huyen Thi ;
Cao, Khuy Minh ;
Le, Linh Dieu Thi ;
Cu, Lam Tung Ngoc ;
Ly, Bang Viet ;
Nguyen, Duong Anh Thi ;
Nguyen, Manh Duc ;
Latkin, Carl A. ;
Ho, Roger C. M. ;
Ho, Cyrus S. H. ;
Zhang, Melvyn W. B. .
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2023, 9 (01)
[79]   Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines to prevent long COVID: data from Norway [J].
Trinh, Nhung T. H. ;
Jodicke, Annika M. ;
Catala, Marti ;
Mercade-Besora, Nuria ;
Hayati, Saeed ;
Lupattelli, Angela ;
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel ;
Nordeng, Hedvig M. E. .
LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (05) :e33-e34
[80]   Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population [J].
Velardo, Fanny ;
Watson, Verity ;
Arwidson, Pierre ;
Alla, Francois ;
Luchini, Stephane ;
Schwarzinger, Michael .
VACCINES, 2021, 9 (11)