New-onset atrial fibrillation detected by ambulatory ECG monitoring after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

被引:1
|
作者
Nuche, Jorge [1 ]
Soliman, Fady [2 ]
Chavarria, Jorge [3 ,4 ]
Okoh, Alexis K. [2 ,5 ]
Mora, Hugo Alvarado [3 ,4 ]
Nault, Isabelle [1 ]
Natarajan, Madhu K. [3 ,4 ]
Russo, Mark [2 ]
Philippon, Francois [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, 2725 Chemin Ste Foy, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G5, Canada
[2] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Emory Univ, Div Cardiol, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
ambulatory ECG monitoring; atrial fibrillation; TAVI; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; STENOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the occurrence of subclinical new -onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of subclinical NOAF after TAVI. METHODS: This was a multicentre study, including patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and no previous atrial fibrillation undergoing TAVI, with continuous ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) monitoring after TAVI. RESULTS: A total of 700 patients (79 +/- 8 years, 49% female, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 2.9% [1.9-4.0]) undergoing transarterial TAVI were included (85% balloon -expandable valves). AECG was started 1 (0-1) day after TAVI (monitoring time: 14 [12-14] days). NOAF was detected in 49 patients (7%), with a median duration of 185 (43-421) minutes (atrial fibrillation burden of 0.7% [0.3-2.8]). Anticoagulation was started in 25 NOAF patients (51%). No differences were found in baseline or procedural characteristics, except for a higher AS severity in the NOAF group (peak gradient: no NOAF: 71.9 +/- 23.5 mmHg vs NOAF: 85.2 +/- 23.8 mmHg; p=0.024; mean gradient: no NOAF: 44.4 +/- 14.7 mmHg vs NOAF: 53.8 +/- 16.8 mmHg; p=0.004). In the multivariable analysis, the baseline mean transaortic gradient was associated with a higher risk of NOAF after TAVI (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.06 for each mmHg; p=0.006). There were no differences between groups in all -cause mortality (no NOAF: 4.7% vs NOAF: 0%; p=0.122), stroke (no NOAF: 1.4% vs NOAF: 2.0%; p=0.723), or bleeding (no NOAF: 1.9% vs NOAF: 4.1%; p=0.288) from the 30 -day to 1 -year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: NOAF detected with AECG occurred in 7% of TAVI recipients and was associated with a higher AS severity. NOAF detection determined the start of anticoagulation therapy in about half of the patients, and it was not associated with an increased risk of clinical events at 1 -year follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 601
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New-onset or newly detected atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Windecker, Stephan
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2024, 20 (09) : 521 - 522
  • [2] Prediction of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Karakulak, Ugur Nadir
    Sahiner, Levent
    Kaya, Ergun Baris
    Sener, Yusuf Ziya
    Ates, Ahmet Hakan
    Aytemir, Kudret
    Ozer, Necla
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 40 (04) : 437 - 444
  • [3] Echocardiographic predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Rodriguez, Z.
    Perez De Isla, L.
    Almeria, C.
    Garcia, E.
    Fernandez, A.
    Marcos-Alberca, P.
    Islas, F.
    Moreno, J.
    Rodrigo, J.
    Macaya, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 175 - 175
  • [4] Contemporary Trends in New-onset Atrial Fibrillation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Shrestha, Dhan
    Kansakar, Sajog
    Shtembari, Jurgen
    Biswas, Monodeep
    Shantha, Ghanshyam
    Storey, James
    Katz, Daniel
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [5] New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Concise Review
    Jorgensen, Troels Hojsgaard
    Thygesen, Julie Bjerre
    Thyregod, Hans Gustav Horsted
    Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup
    Sondergaard, Lars
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01): : 41 - 47
  • [6] Clinical Implication of Atrial Conductance Impairment on New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 40 (06)
  • [7] Incidence, Predictors, Management, and Clinical Significance of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Yoon, Yong-Hoon
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Kang, Do-Yoon
    Ko, Euihong
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Ho Jin
    Kim, Joon Bum
    Choo, Suk Jung
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 123 (07): : 1127 - 1133
  • [8] New-onset atrial fibrillation and increased mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A causal or spurious association?
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    Capodanno, Davide
    Sannino, Anna
    Barbanti, Marco
    Perrino, Cinzia
    Capranzano, Piera
    Stabile, Eugenio
    Indolfi, Ciro
    Trimarco, Bruno
    Tamburino, Corrado
    Esposito, Giovanni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 203 : 264 - 266
  • [9] New-onset atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictive factors and prognostic value
    Mancio, J.
    Fontes-Carvalho, R.
    Caeiro, D.
    Oliveira, M.
    Albuquerque, A.
    Simoes, L.
    Gama, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2013, 12 : S227 - S228
  • [10] Response to Letter to the Editor: Clinical Implication of Atrial Conductance Impairment on New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Karakulak, Ugur Nadir
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 40 (06) : 822 - 823